Author Topic: Chesse20; God damn already, boy.  (Read 16372 times)

Noedit: I did read it.
I fail to see how copying someone else's work is an improvement.
Also:

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=88687.0
He's not copying someone's work. It's the same thing, but made legible.


Also: Good times, goooooood times.

But you see, my parents would know I'm lying, as Tingalz has never improved.
So what you're saying is you don't like that thread because it's hard on the eyes?
In a sense.
That wont happen. You should know this community by now.
Which is why the "Ignore Him" argument is invalid.

He's not copying someone's work. It's the same thing, but made legible.


Also: Good times, goooooood times.
Noedit fsadsaf:
Did he do any work towards the legibility?

No, but I still don't see how it's copying.

Also:
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=88687.0
Irrelevant. If I see someone picking on someone else, I tend to side with the person getting picked on until evidence is shown that the victim deserves it. So far, chesse hasn't broken any rules.

Did he do any work towards the legibility?
We've been over this. No. I did. And as far as that thread is concerned I'll be willing to do that again.

No, but I still don't see how it's copying.
It's an author's responsibility to make sure his work is legible. He did not, so he's taking Qwepir's version which might not be accurate completely and claiming it as his own.

It's an author's responsibility to make sure his work is legible. He did not, so he's taking Qwepir's version which might not be accurate completely and claiming it as his own.
For forget's sake. He asked me if he could use it and I told him he could. I never said he had to give me credit. Also, isn't it the editor that revises mistakes?

No edit again.
Irrelevant. If I see someone picking on someone else, I tend to side with the person getting picked on until evidence is shown that the victim deserves it. So far, chesse hasn't broken any rules.
We've been over this. No. I did. And as far as that thread is concerned I'll be willing to do that again.
Half of the Drama topics are not about breaking of the rules, they're about users and their personalities. I think I've supplied sufficient proof that Chesse is either very stupid or is a troll, or perhaps both.

For forget's sake. He asked me if he could use it and I told him he could. I never said he had to give me credit. Also, isn't it the editor that revises mistakes?
If you're a professional author. He still did not credit you and thus it seems as if he's claiming it as his own.

quote author=Dusty12 link=topic=99499.msg1920718#msg1920718 date=1266128723]
Which is why the "Ignore Him" argument is invalid.
[/quote]
Depends on what way you look at it.

If someone is bothering an individual, the individual should just ignore that person.

However, if someone is making a stuffload of stuffty topics, there isn't much you can really do. Yeah sure, some of the smart people won't post because they don't want to make it worse, but the rest of the community will go on a rampage through the topics.


Oh, and about the whole "HE DIDN'T BREAK RULES THING!"
If you only post topics about people breaking rules, this would be a loving pointless section.
If someone is breaking rules, you would just report them and not make a topic.
The reason we have this drama section is because people have a problem with a specific person or action.


I've supplied sufficient proof that Chesse is very stupid
He is not a troll. A troll seeks to provoke people into arguing or otherwise pissing people off. Usually you can tell if they're a troll because they bring up controversial topics or opinions. Being grammatically challenged does not constitute a troll.

Oh, and about the whole "HE DIDN'T BREAK RULES THING!"
If you only post topics about people breaking rules, this would be a loving pointless section.
My point is that I don't see any annoying behavior in chesse.

He is not a troll. A troll seeks to provoke people into arguing or otherwise pissing people off. Usually you can tell if they're a troll because they bring up controversial topics or opinions. Being grammatically challenged does not constitute a troll.
My point is that I don't see any annoying behavior in chesse.
So making a stuffload of useless topics (one or two are ok) and pissing people off because of it, is not a troll?

Well, that's you Qwepir. And you're Tingalz's brother, so I'm not suprised why you don't find it annoying.

So making a stuffload of useless topics (one or two are ok) and pissing people off because of it, is not a troll?
Disregarding his multiple clan topics, link me to 5 totally useless topics he has made

Well, that's you Qwepir. And you're Tingalz's brother, so I'm not suprised why you don't find it annoying.
True, but again, irrelevant.

Disregarding his multiple clan topics, link me to 5 totally useless topics he has made
True, but again, irrelevant.
Why should I disregard his clan spam? It's evidence to the fact he is indeed very stupid or a troll, or a mixture.

How can it be true but irrelevant? You're Tingalz's brother, one of the most annoying blocklanders at some times, so you're used to this behavior. It's perfectly relevant.