thats not really what that rule is referring to.
the users on blockland have a hard time deciphering the rules' meanings.
I know what the rule originally referred to, and it still applies here. If you're gonna argue and consistently make no sense in the process, you're unintelligible.
Completely unintelligible? Y'know I get that a lot of people lose their stuff when someone disagrees with their e-opinion but if you actually read through his posts it's all spelled correctly and coherently structured.
I like how you basically told us here that he's not actually breaching rule 6, he just fits your personal criteria for unintelligible. This topic sucks.
Structured, sure, Coherently? lol no.
He starts off his topic with a view point or a misleading article of "news." When people either refute or post something he doesn't like, he'll start the argument and with 100% contradictions and asking irrelevant questions or making irrelevant points. If that's not unintelligible bullstuff then I don't know what is.
I can see a majority of people don't seem to agree with this topic. I don't understand why you've all come to the norm that Tony is just here now. You'll be completely intolerant of anyone else who tries this stupid stuff, but because Tony has been doing it for so long it's just another normal thing on the BLF.
Tony really annoys me, mainly from his unsourced/ambiguous news topics.
Now see, I don't mind the topics themselves, it's his other posts inside the same topics.