1
Off Topic / Re: Phone won't turn off even though I took the battery out
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:04:20 PM »
Are you sure it is still on? The screen could be burnt in.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
it is proper. And I don't really have anywhere else. I've spent hours on this.I've estimated the angle from the wall to be about 79 degrees. The ground is irrelevant. My teacher put that there when he was helping me out but it might have been torque. I don't remember which.I was just using the ground as a way to communicate a horizontal flat line.
what the forget whyProbably because saying, "I REALLY want to dismiss the topic but I won't" and then not adding anything that would show that you're not dismissing the topic, is dismissing the topic. It's kind of like someone saying to another person, "I want to say you're stupid but I'm not going to".
cool stuff.https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=53535713&token=1XSWmMZA
hey guys I'm giving away my bunsen burner(FT). Enter if ya want it. 6 entries only, post your trade link below.
'96 C4 Corvette in Torch Red is my #1 dream carAyy that's what I have. I'm currently debating whether or not to sell it to put money towards a newer one.
If NK attacks the US, will NATO get involved? Just curiousYes, Article 5 of the Treaty states that an attack on any of the member states is considered an attack on all of the member states.
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .
oh man i remember a game that was a lot like this. stuff that was funDemolition, Inc?
i think it was made by ubi or something?
you were an alien that had to destroy everything on earth to make it like an alien wildlife reservation or something
you used like... just small stuff. oil spills, sticky puddles, and you could sometimes even control cars yourself
any idea what it was?
yeah let's risk people's lives because otherwise we would be wasting spaceso make it accessible to people. they still don't need to be up there constantlyIt's hardly any more of a risk than being anywhere else on the ship. (I think I already stated this but) the tower on a ship is one of the safest parts of the ship, its the most armored section, and the least important (if a ship takes out the bridge no problem, they wasted a shot they could have used to destroy a gun, missile rack, or explode the magazine) While it may be the least important, it still carries some significance, as it houses communications and all the navigation, but it isn't exactly a priority for an opposing ship to take out. Back before missiles, the bridge was most certainly a very dangerous place, but since smart missiles, they generally target the body of the ship to exploit the explosives generally stored below deck. I will also point out that it's not like ship bridges are constantly blown off and people die, it's still dangerous to be anywhere on a ship when a battle occurs.
it's also worth noting that submarines don't have bridges
edit: after looking up the definition of "bridge" the word is more broad than I thought. so submarines do have bridges. but I'm sure you get the point