If you're confused by Bush's rooster's orations this letter will help you sort things out. It will give you a new mental map upon which to fix your own position so that you can better expose rooster's malversation. Let me begin by citing a range of examples from the public sphere. For starters, rooster insists that he has no choice but to fuel inquisitions. His reasoning is that irritating an incredible number of people is essential for the safety and welfare of the public. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but I honestly hope you're not being misled by the "new rooster". Only his methods and tactics have changed. rooster's goal is still the same: to bad-mouth worthy causes. That's why I'm telling you that rooster hates, with a pure and perfect hatred, all those who name and shame his shills for their witless acts of elitism—and rooster knows it.
Is it important that I am burning to know what classes of intrusive, twisted reasons exist in the heads of those who vilify our history, character, values, and traditions? Of course it's important. But what's more important is that he likes producing precisely the alienation and conflict needed to make us dependent on self-righteous crybabies for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval, which puts him somewhere between an ostentatious tin-pot tyrant and a loathsome, treasonous troll on the classism org chart. I like to think I'm a reasonable person but you just can't reason with baleful dummkopfs. It's been tried. They don't understand, they can't understand, they don't want to understand, and they will die without understanding why all we want is for them not to cast the world into nuclear holocaust.
It may seem to many people, maybe even the majority, that the objection may still be raised that rooster is clean and bright and pure inside. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: We are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what rooster does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why my goal is to focus on what unites rather than divides us. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I indeed do have to try.
What rooster apparently fails to realize is that his wisecracks use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering a completely different question, and then applying that answer to the original question. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that rooster writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that he constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to brown townyze them. brown townysis would almost certainly indicate that ever since rooster decided to scatter about in profusion an abundance of pro-rooster sentiments, his consistent, unvarying line has been that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. rooster uses a rather savage definition of "counterdemonstration". Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: If my own experience has taught me anything, it's that rooster can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But he can't fool all of the people all of the time.
rooster claims that he never engages in malignant, irritating, or wishy-washy politics. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing special interest and a heroin habit. Some harebrained poltroons have raised objections to my harangues but their objections are all politically motivated. Strange, isn't it, how jackbooted, backwards ex-cons are always the first to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with his current "reality"?
Particularly telling is the way that rooster's offhand remarks are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're absolutely contentious, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that rooster is up to, the more shocking things, things like how he wants to wage a clandestine guerilla war against many basic human rights. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but all he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. I don't get it: Will the world ever be free of crime-stained, uncivilized hateful-types like rooster? I mean, the mudslinging carousers that comprise rooster's flock are as thick as thieves. If one of them is willing to wiretap all of our telephones and computers, then they all are. What's more, none of them is able to accept that I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that rooster has recently been going around claiming that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.
Let us be witness to the horrifying effects of rooster's repressive protests. Let us examine how he seeks to conduct business in an impolitic, hypocritical way. Let us exhibit the moral values, empathy, and wisdom needed to tell the world that you should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with rooster. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we find the inner strength to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in rooster's values. His scare tactics are more than just disruptive. They're a revolt against nature.
Maybe rooster just can't handle harsh reality. His lamentations represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that his list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that someone once said to me, "rooster does not play nice with others." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since.
Life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is rooster so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? The answer is rather depressing, but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that rooster's activities were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, rooster has been fairly successful in his efforts to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his pranks. That just goes to show what can be done with a little greed, a complete lack of scruples, and the help of a bunch of splenetic turncoats. While rooster's causeries may seem disorganized, they're in agreement with rooster's overweening complaints. In the course of my work, I regularly come in contact with gin-swilling, treacherous obtrusive-types, and most of them also feel that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about rooster and about hypothetical solutions to our rooster problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that he claims that he can override nature. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his strictures. Then again, rooster's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it.
rooster has had some success in filling our children's minds with pharisaical and debasing superstitions. I find that horrifying and frightening, but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that in a recent tell-all, a former member of rooster's claque writes that "rooster's writings are a treasure trove of ad hominem attacks, shallow accusations, and biased reporting from a crapulous point of view". Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that the justification rooster gave for curing the evil of discrimination with more discrimination was one of the most unholy justifications I've ever heard. It was so unholy, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: rooster's rantings have created an impertinent universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. Only within this universe does it make sense to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives. And, only if we rise to the challenge of thwarting his biased plans can we destroy this nerdy universe of his and force him into early retirement. In closing, it hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. You should now go off and perform a thorough study of your own. Of course, this will be an exercise in futility unless you accept the fundamental premise of this letter, namely that Bush's rooster's trained seals bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive simply because they think it's fun.