fair enough, but my point is like if someone were to bomb a school and it turns out it's somehow tied to the BL community, does that mean i'm some mad child bomber too?
Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.
Because there are so many extreme examples of feminism and parodies of said examples, it becomes difficult to differ between what's a parody and what isn't. The fault of this usually doesn't lie on the satirical examples, but on the extremism for being so extreme that it's basically a parody of itself.
Basically, let's say extremist feminists said "kill all men" often enough, and it was parodied enough that now when somebody says "kill all men", nobody can tell if it's supposed to be a parody or not.
The detrimental part of poe's law is that it becomes harder to take feminism seriously.
