First drama topic in a while, but he was asking for it.
Please refer to the following link,
Diggy's gallery topic, and read what you can of our argument over his abusiveness.
What happens is this: A member posts how he was abusing, and I said that I would deal with him in some way. He then tries to defend his abusive behavior by saying that a player was giving one of his friends a hard time. He made up a rule, basically. After we go back and forth about his abuse of power, the argument wanes for a little.
He then posts how he would continue to abuse a certain player, and I said how I didn't believe he would get away with it because of his past with Diggy, which he replies to with an ambiguous "Haha Niliscro" that doesn't address any point I was making.
After that, he tries to convince me that I'm on a power trip because I'm trying to deadmin him for abuse, which is pretty hypocritical for him to say, since he's the one on a power trip for abusing admin in the first place. He said that Diggy has read all of the argument and agrees with Loser, which I find hard to believe because he would have intervened at some point. Then he brings up how I was acting superior to him, which isn't necessarily true. We get back on the topic of his abuse, and he asks me to point out other times he abused.
I quote him saying how he always makes up rules, which he responds to by saying that he was generalizing, in which case it was irrelevant to say.
That doesn't strictly apply to Diggy's server thank you very much, it's just generally known. Go ahead and ask the many players that admin me of my abuse. You'll find that that is not the case.
Main problem in that post is the second sentence (italics), which doesn't make any sense whatsoever, so he tries to convince me that it does and I'm just stupid. He was pretty much trolling at the end of this argument (page 29 in the thread).
Discuss.
