Author Topic: Red Steel 2  (Read 1714 times)

pixl i though only 1 percent of Nintendo games had blood

pixl i though only 1 percent of Nintendo games had blood
You're stupid.

getting it tomorrow. Sad part: The motion plus part is useless, there are are limited hitboxes, a slash in the head is the same as one in the leg, so you could swing the sword anywhere and it would do that same.

saw gameplay: There are object physics with the sword. Not the best, but if you cut something vertically, when it falls to the ground it'll act like so. No blood. meh, I guess it doesnt matter.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2010, 10:22:08 PM by oromis »

LET ME SHOW YOU MY MOVES!

pixl i though only 1 percent of Nintendo games had blood
0% of nintendo's games contain blood.
however, third party developers are another story..

There is blood in Metroid... green, alien blood.

I guess your right, I can't really think of any other Nintendo games that do. Red Steel 2 looks like it will be great thoguh

yeah the first one was like learning how to develop on the wii lol.

they made enemies stumble around and miss all the time JUST because the wiimote couldn't aim fast enough to frag them off.

In this one or the first Red steel?

Oh god, I want it, but I dont like my wii
Hard choice :<

Reds eel <3(If you dont get it, on the first case, the T was a katana and made it look like "RedS eel")

... I went to gamestation and got the game. Oops, doesn't come with motion +. F

From what I've read and watched and seen it looks bad.

Thanks for putting in your elaborate opinion, now care to explain?

0% of nintendo's games contain blood.
however, third party developers are another story..
The Metroid games had some blood.
Granted, it was alien blood.

Thanks for putting in your elaborate opinion, now care to explain?

It's my opinion. In my mind it's bad, and in yours it might be the best game ever. I don't need a reason, as it is just what I have gathered from what I've seen of the game.