1) asdf
2) No there isn't and if there is I guaruntee it wasn't big enough or at the right time. I want a link.
3) And don't forget all the water dwellers, the massive increase in water pressure, decrease in salinity and changed wave patterns would kill them all too without some sort of noah's submarine or floating aquarium. Birds can't fly for 40 days or whatever it was.
1) Random response to intelligible response.
2)
http://www.hannoveribc.com/clientimages/25727/chronological/extrasjanuary/floodlegends.pdf http://www.conservapedia.com/Great_Flood It's also a good note that the "world" was a lot smaller back in those days. Limited to "known science" at the time to most
of the middle east and Persia. The number of known species in that time was also infinitesimal to what is known now and is
still growing every day. I'm pretty sure you know this yourself and are conveniently side stepping it in your endless quest
to discredit something that doesn't really seem to affect you save for being annoying when someone mentions it.
3) You must have missed my point of the fish swimming in the sea. they are water dwellers and no, I did not forget the other
fresh water thingies that also make their living in the sea...oh right, they wouldn't be there. It's too salty. And if all the
fresh water in the world were to suddenly be dumped into the ocean the salinity wouldn't be effected to the point of mass
extinction considering you did your research and find out that the seas around the area where this flood supposedly
happened was salt water ergo the flood was constituted of salt water. But I'm sure you also knew that. I'm sure you also
knew that if a flood were to happen of fresh water to salt water that the sheer amount of salt water is about 90% to
fresh water's 10%. Yup, the oceans would purify themselves from that onrush of fresh water.
Seriously, do you people even do your own research or simply make stuff up?
