Author Topic: Why are there so many f*cking sequels to one game? (Read 2293 times)

ultimamax · March 05, 2010, 08:30:57 AM

Assassin's Creed. Do you know how bad the first game was?
But they changed that in the sequel.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Madmitten · March 05, 2010, 08:43:19 AM

pokemon is probably the only good game for a portable console.

Bisjac · March 05, 2010, 08:52:20 AM

if ~~12 year old girls would quit seeing crappy movies~~ 12 year old boys would quit buying crappy games, less crappy games would be made.

snot2 · March 05, 2010, 09:13:24 AM

if the first final fantasy game did not sell then there wouldnt be so many sequals

No, FROHman Elite! · March 05, 2010, 09:14:11 AM

Quote from: ultimamax on March 05, 2010, 08:30:57 AM

Assassin's Creed. Do you know how bad the first game was?
But they changed that in the sequel.

The only bad thing about it is that you can only kill 3 civillians, which ruins the purpose of a fun massacre.

Meekl · March 05, 2010, 02:26:26 PM

Quote from: snot2 on March 05, 2010, 09:13:24 AM

if the first final fantasy game did not sell then there wouldnt be so many sequals

/agree
Most video gamemakers are very iffy when it comes to sequels. If people like it they make 300 more and eventually you're shooting at flying lamps. If people don't like a game, the gamemaker either acts like it never happened or makes a new version that ISN'T a sequel that makes more sense/better stuff. So, sequels can't really be stopped.

snot2 · March 05, 2010, 03:30:27 PM

square where actually bankrupt when they made the first final fantasy

WOLFPACK2 · March 05, 2010, 03:34:25 PM

sequels are for when a game is released and everyone likes it the creators want to either make more moeny or to "update" it and give the second one better graphics more stuff so on...i mean look at Half-Life and Half-Life 2 huge changes were made between the 2.

i agree with you about pokemon, they have stretched it a bit toooooooo much...