Author Topic: dkamm65- Trolling me in every thread possible.  (Read 15523 times)

He is male as he said in his profile.
skill4life said he was female. Now it's male.

Without veiwing peoples profiles, can you guess what gender people are just by looking at their messages? With most people you can, but with the ~60% of people here, you cannot tell whether they are male or female. Dkamm a perfect example of the ~60%. WRB852 an excellent example of the ~40%.

I thought this was about homoloveuality, not gender.

Blah, your big words turn me on.
I've been using them a lot. I like sounding smarter more intellectual then I really am.

I thought this was about homoloveuality, not gender.
It's about both. People acting like male and females. Your stereotypical 'gay' person.

Improve your English.
What the forget do you mean by "improve your English"?

The sentence that I typed was grammatically correct.

Double post due to lack of edit.

The only reason you would resort to pointing out any grammatical errors in the first place would be to change the subject and divert attention from the fact that you are attempting to conceal your homoloveuality.

I like sounding smarter more intellectual then I really am.

I'm a quite vivid on what I am.



Improve your English.

Lol hypocrisy. :cookieMonster:

You're wrong about sounding intellectual - so I assume you're also wrong about not liking richard.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2010, 06:22:47 PM by Ephialtes »

Lol hypocrisy. :cookieMonster:
I do love a good bit of irony.

It's also enjoyable to watch a thread backfire.


It's also enjoyable to watch a thread backfire.

All threads backfire in the end...

MUWAHAHAHA

All threads backfire in the end...

MUWAHAHAHA
No they don't.



Lol hypocrisy. :cookieMonster:

You're wrong about sounding intellectual - so I assume you're also wrong about not liking richard.
Whoops, it's like the thing I pointed out to you. I was going to say 'a little bit more', but couldnt think of a word, so I went back and forgot the a.

Hypocripsy ;)


And you're not to say on what I like, regardless of your position on the forum. And anyways, I already have a richard, why would I want to see someone elses?

Hypocripsy ;)

Lawl. :cookieMonster:

And anyways, I already have a richard, why would I want to see someone elses?

Judging by all the drama topics you make, you must have a vagina too - so why would you want to see another vagina? Now that you don't want to see vagina I can only assume you want to see richard (although you won't admit it) therefore making you a closeted homoloveual.

Double post due to lack of edit.

The only reason you would resort to pointing out any grammatical errors in the first place would be to change the subject and divert attention from the fact that you are attempting to conceal your homoloveuality.
There is more then one reason on why I would 'resort' to pointing out your bad grammar.
One, it made no sense, and it would have been kind to point this out.
Two, I might have ADD and find it hard to concentrate, thus making me point out unnessacary things.
It was a mixture of both one and two for me. (I don't think I have ADD, I'm just not good at concentrating on things for a long/short time.)

Also, when replying to your post, even if I had said 'Fair enough; you win', it would have been to what you had just said, which was me calling people gay, and last time I checked, calling people gay doesn't make you a homoloveual (nor does it make you a closet homoloveual).
 And if any other random forumer had said that, which they probably would have, you would in no way decided to do anything about it.
Just goes to proove you're only here to proove me wrong- maybe to grow some forum e-peen? I don't know. At your age, you should be a bit smarter then that.


What the forget do you mean by "improve your English"?

The sentence that I typed was grammatically correct.
It's a large collective of people, so you've called said large collective of people gay.
It wouldn't even make sense if you moved it around.

It wouldn't even make sense if you moved it around.
It wouldn't, because it makes sense the way it is.