Author Topic: Westboro Baptist Church  (Read 24230 times)

It's irrelevant how much your opinion affects society. You're still a douche.
That should be a bumper sticker.  :cookieMonster:

It's irrelevant how much your opinion affects society. You're still a douche.
k

 Their the kind of people that never heard of free will. God him self said when he created man he gave them freedom of decision.
 These people would think that Blockland was created by God, not Badspot. From the example that they said the Internet came from God, no the Human who decided to make the Internet.

 By law their religion must die, they don't represent Christianity. Their just a waste of space.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2010, 03:48:35 PM by Riot »

By law their religion must die, they don't represent Christianity. Their just a waste of space.
Maybe we should petition them.  :cookieMonster:

Their the kind of people that never heard of free will. God him self said when he created man he gave them freedom of decision.
 These people would think that Blockland was created by God, not Badspot. From the example that they said the Internet came from God, no the Human who decided to make the Internet.

 By law their religion must die, they don't represent Christianity. Their just a waste of space.
i wish someone would go as far to do that what think?

 Just because I can't get at them my hatred is boiling hotter every day.

By law their religion must die, they don't represent Christianity. Their just a waste of space.

What did I say about the first amendment? The government cannot persecute nor endorse any religion.

What did I say about the first amendment? The government cannot persecute nor endorse any religion.

 By my law >:C

By my law >:C

And Riots law is always right!

Go make a country or something, kthx

And Riots law is always right!

Go make a country or something, kthx
he has considered it
If he does, im the VP


What did I say about the first amendment? The government cannot persecute nor endorse any religion.
'Cept Muslims  :cookieMonster:   

That was uncalled for. I am deeply ashamed. :c

Their group hurts me, though. They give humans a bad name, regardless or race, religion, or origin of birth. They preach that their "all-loving, forgiving God" hates everyone. >.>

If they stopped searching for "hidden messages" and for "sacred codes", and stopped taking everything in the Bible to a literal extreme, they'd realize what they're doing is completely contradictory to what their religion was originally based on. However, now it seems they just are making their own religion that apparently hate everyone except them. I don't like looking through windows, but they've completely shattered theirs......


Ah well. I guess the only thing we can do is Love and Love, and spread it to those they discriminate, so we may stand together and bring an end to the turmoil they spread. (Especially to the poor children who are just growing up with this. Most have absolutely no idea what they are even doing, they just follow what there parents do.)

<3

No, they are protected fully by the constitution. They are not trampling on anyone's rights. They protest on public property and therefore can not be stopped. They even have restrictions on how close to the funeral they can be.

Don't spew stuff out of your asses; the first amendment is not something you can mess around with.
I'm not spewing stuff.
Quote from: Wikipedia
American tort liability for defamatory speech or publications—slander and libel—traces its origins to English law. The nature of American defamation law was vitally changed by the Supreme Court in 1964, in deciding New York Times Co. v. Sullivan  376 U.S. 254 (1964). The New York Times had published an advertisement indicating that officials in Montgomery, Alabama had acted violently in suppressing the protests of African-Americans during the civil rights movement. The Montgomery Police Commissioner, L. B. Sullivan, sued the Times for libel claiming the advertisement damaged his reputation. The Supreme Court unanimously overruled the $500,000 judgment against the Times. Justice Brennan suggested that public officials may sue for libel only if the publisher published the statements in question with "actual malice."
Their "right" to do that is not protected under the first amendment or any other legal documentation.

LOL

You don't even know what libel is. They are not committing libel; don't lie.

Just because they aren't breaking any laws doesn't mean they aren't douchebags.