Author Topic: Anti-Theists and Anti-Atheists.  (Read 8283 times)

if I told you I could be lying

Atheism is the lack of a belief
You are wrong Atheism is belief that something is false. Negative belief is not absence of belief.

I could just as easily say that theism is 'lack of belief' that theism false.

If you said that you would be wrong just trying to avoid the point.

How about you morons stop skimming through the topic thinking you know what it's supposed to be about?


You cannot prove or disprove religion so stop fighting about it and wasting your life.

you're browsing the same forum I am and wasting the exact same amount of time

All that quote proves is that people are easily influenced. It goes either way. Not really a counter-statement.
The fact is that the fundamental statements of every religion are as disproven as they're going to get. Creation of life by a god is a notion that has been almost completely disproven, as self-replicating RNA has been created within recreations of Earth from some billions of years ago. Cell membranes, proteins, and other essential parts of life have also been synthesized.

By paragraph:
2: I don't bother to argue the core belief in existence in an undetectable spirit because there is no way for either side to gain any ground. Dkamm's method of arguing it is basically the only way either side can argue it. While you claim negative statements cannot be argued, I would say otherwise. Some things simply aren't possible (here).

3: See above. The burden of proof shouldn't have to fall on anyone because that's one of the beliefs that cannot be disproven, as agitating as it is. See this video.

5: See above..

1: I enjoy these arguments. 2: I'd like it Magick would stop thinking he's some legendary peacemaker and am in the process of proving this to him.

Anyway, to go about it a less arguable way.

I view the argument between atheism and theism to be a math problem.

Lets say each term is evidence. The problem would go on infinitely to reach proof.

4+11+19-7+60.......=? While at this point in time the problem seems to reflect a positive result, there's no telling what more evidence may bring.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2010, 10:32:09 PM by Doomonkey »

what, that's not at all how it is

The fact is that the fundamental statements of every religion are as disproven as they're going to get. Creation of life by a god is a notion that has been almost completely disproven, as self-replicating RNA has been created within recreations of Earth from some billions of years ago. Cell membranes, proteins, and other essential parts of life have also been synthesized.
Because 3+1=4 2+2=/=4... That's what your argument is. You say because things can happen scientifically there is no other way.

The existence or lack thereof of an undetectable entity is definitively impossible to prove. However, core beliefs of the religion can be disproven, which is enough in my opinion to disprove the entire religion.

You say because things can happen scientifically there is no other way.
What other way is there?...



a wizard did it
Holy stuff.

I almost said that along with your avatar :c

The ultimate truth is that anybody who enters a religious or political argument and expects any positive outcome is quite literally insane.

Secondly, anybody who tries to put a stop to religious or political arguments and expects any positive outcome is also insane.



The existence or lack thereof of an undetectable entity is definitively impossible to prove. However, core beliefs of the religion can be disproven, which is enough in my opinion to disprove the entire religion.
What core beliefs?