Author Topic: Hot Girls  (Read 1594526 times)


Have you ever heard of special interestes?

Anyways, if you are so confident the chains aren't loveual, give me an alternate interpretation of them.

Dodger did you ever see or heard of a photographer who only photographs naked people? Would you find this loveual? It isn't, it's considered art. There's nothing wrong with the human body being exposed if it's for the sake of art.

Have you ever heard of special interestes?
My God, is that really all you can think about? Jesus Christ.


Not a big fan of punk girls
or whatever they are when they dress like the girls in nym's pictures

I myself have that special interest thank you very much.

and if nude photography isn't loveual why did you just say fashion which is art like the photography can be loveual? I can easily interpret otherwise though I would be considered a pervert. It's like symbolism in literature, people may see it other ways. Aren't humans natural instincts suppose to be to reproduce? Then exposing the human body naturally will provoke loveual thought in people.

So wait how much suggestiveness is allowed? Hands covering nipples? Booties? Photoshopped nudity? (No nipples and such.) I could dump a tad bit.
Someone answer, I ain't gonna get banned for something as stupid as this.

I think you can black bar and such, and just as long as the parts aren't actually seeable

and if nude photography isn't loveual why did you just say fashion which is art like the photography can be loveual?
I meant that most will interpret it as loveual, but they shouldn't.

Someone answer, I ain't gonna get banned for something as stupid as this.
So wait how much suggestiveness is allowed? Hands covering nipples? Booties? Photoshopped nudity? (No nipples and such.) I could dump a tad bit.

Hands covering nipples - Yes
Booties - Just make sure they have some form of clothing on the booties
Photoshopped Nudity - Noep

I meant that most will interpret it as loveual, but they shouldn't.

A lot of creators of various forms of art art usually have their stuff misinterpreted bit oh well. So many people seem to miss the point of Nirvana lyrics for example. I was wearing a Nirvana shirt and a girl complemented me on it but then insulted my shoes because they weren't fashionable. Cobain always had messages of not being afraid to go against and not conform to the popular thing, but that chick obviously missed it. I just have to deal with it. Unfortunately, love is even more natural than a want for good fashion so many people will think about that when looking at nude, compatible humans of the opposite gender. You just have to deal with it too.


Booties - Just make sure they have some form of clothing on the booties

I posted some bare ass earlier and nothing happened.

Also considering the fact that Ningyou does not have a snake, she wouldn't know my interpretation of loveuality.

Also considering the fact that Ningyou does not have a snake, she wouldn't know my interpretation of loveuality.
Oh you're loveist now too, cool.

Oh you're loveist now too, cool.

Um no

It's obvious that the differing genders see loveuality from different viewpoints.

I never said the male's view is superior.

Dodger ignores my questions cause he's wrong

win