Hot Girls

[Dodger]

I see nothing wrong with the second one. The third one is more of an art picture to me.

Chains and leather totally don't arouse people, especially those with special interestes for stiff like bondage.

You can pose feces (for an example) in a fancy setting and try to make it look nice and polish it up but it's still stuff. It's still a loveually arousing picture and you can't deny that.

[Ningyou]

Chains and leather totally don't arouse people, especially those with special interestes for stiff like bondage.

You can pose feces (for an example) in a fancy setting and try to make it look nice and polish it up but it's still stuff.

I didn't even think about bondage. I don't think any decent people would.

[Nymethus]

Chains and leather totally don't arouse people, especially those with special interestes for stiff like bondage.

it's called fashion you wimp

you didn't answer my question either

[Ningyou]

Besides I don't see how chains on the hips are loveually arousing in any way. If it was like this collar with chains on it, now that would be different.

[Dodger]

I didn't even think about bondage. I don't think any decent people would.

Define "decent", because the last 2 pictures aren't exactly tame. What else do you think about when you see chains?

it's called fashion you wimp

you didn't answer my question either
Whore as in very loveually open

[Ningyou]

Define "decent", because the last 2 pictures aren't exactly tame. What else do you think about when you see chains?

Nothing. Chains aren't particularly loveual, nor is leather. I have a leather jacket, ohoho that's so loveual of me!

[Dodger]

Nothing. Chains aren't particularly loveual, nor is leather. I have a leather jacket, ohoho that's so loveual of me!

It's tight on her. Plus the addition of the chains to it can invoke loveual thought in people still. Just because it's considered fashion doesn't mean it will be considered clean by all people.

[Nymethus]

Whore as in very loveually open

so wearing shorts means you're "loveually open"?

[Dodger]

so wearing shorts means you're "loveually open"?

It's provocative the way she is wearing them.

[Nymethus]

It's tight on her. Plus the addition of the chains to it can invoke loveual thought in people still. Just because it's considered fashion doesn't mean it will be considered clean by all people.

It's tight on her because she's a girl. How many people do you know who get aroused by chains?

It's provocative the way she is wearing them.

where would you put them? on her head?

Here's an idea: all girls are whores because they're girls so they might invoke loveual thoughts

[Ningyou]

It's tight on her. Plus the addition of the chains to it can invoke loveual thought in people still. Just because it's considered fashion doesn't mean it will be considered clean by all people.

No, only perverts like you would think so. That's exactly what I mean by "decent people wouldn't think of that". Fashion can be loveual, it's art. There's a difference between a whore and a creative person who likes art.

[Faoeoa]

Start posting pictures before i go back to the TV research.

[Nymethus]

Start posting pictures before i go back to the TV research.

oh yeah all those "whores" in the commercial break

[Dodger]

So I'm a pervert because I somewhat relate chains to loveual stuff yet a "creative" person who incorparates love into mainstrean art and fashion is honored because it at least looks pretty and all the fans of it enjoy it? This is why I consider society bullstuff.

Oh wait, the chains are a fashion and are therefore "art", yet when I relate that to love which may have been the creator's original intent, I get scolded for my interpretation of it.

[Nymethus]

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=109961.msg4202886#msg4202886