Author Topic: Hot Girls  (Read 1594365 times)

That is not disgustingly fat at all.
THe only thing that is questionable is her face. From what I can see of it I don't like.

There's a difference between disgustingly fat as opposed to plump n' healthy.

She looks fine to me.

That's because she is fine. It's realistic, imo. If you can't appreciate a body like that, you'd probably end up living your life alone. :I

I think shes cute :o

Only real point you have is those self drawn drawings  :cookieMonster:

I mean I guess she's OK if you have no standards and will forget anything with a hole.

I am too sophisticated for such though.


She looks fine.
Of course you think that. You're the fattest whore on these forums.

Of course you think that. You're the fattest whore on these forums.

That's something Stocking would say.

Well then Stocking has good taste. I've been calling Miika a fat whore before Stocking was even here though.

Of course you think that. You're the fattest whore on these forums.
Please give me more attention Otis, I like it B)


Well then Stocking has good taste. I've been calling Miika a fat whore before Stocking was even here though.

It's weird because she's fat but she has absolutely no ass at all.

lolwot how is that disgustingly fat.

i'm sorry but you have the 3/10 slice of regular girls such as the one I posted.
5/10 slice of the emo/cigarettes/scenekids that most of you post (Nythemus)
the 1/10 slice of the pr0n stars that are obtainable
and the 1/10 of the actually 'hot' 'classy' 'gorgeous' slice of women.

and trust me, after spending a year with the gorgeous hot classy women, you realise they've got a major personality defect and when they hit 40, they'll be ugly anyway.

so i'd take a normal girl anyday.

so i'd take a normal girl anyday.
You're 16. You would shag nearly anything that moves.

I put that girl at a solid 2.5/10, the minimum score for not having any severe physical abnormalities.