Poll

How do you think the new "Black Ops" looks?

UBER EPIC
SUPER UBER EPIC
Epic
Stupid
GAY!
Normal lookin' crap...

Author Topic: Cod6 - Black-Ops!  (Read 4304 times)

You guys can diss halo and CoD but name an actually better shooter that runs well on pc, 360, or ps3.
I never dissed it, I just said it's pretty much the same game every sequel with different settings and graphics, like Halo.

Not as bad as Final Fantasy or Mario

Whoops, I was thinking of the 6 that quit after the Jason West and Vincent Zampella firings, sorry to be harsh there, my mistake.
I thought that it was by activision.  Huh.

It's about damn time they put in campaign coop.

It's about damn time they put in campaign coop.
It was in WaW.....

Rawr Moayrden Waurfaare Suuuuks!! CodFaaaaag!

Oh god yes, mw2 must be stuff... Of course! that explains why its the best selling game ever... Its soooo stuff.

Activision is even greedier than IW. Even after the game sold millions of copies, Activision did not pay IW, so thats why some of the designers quit.

Activision is even greedier than IW. Even after the game sold millions of copies, Activision did not pay IW, so thats why some of the designers quit.
IW isn't greedy, they were a legitimate developer with a desire to make good games, and they succeeded, but Activision came in and corrupted the stuff out of the CoD franchise and treated IW developers like stuff, because Bobby Kotick has no buisness ethics and is just generally an evil, evil man.

IW isn't greedy, they were a legitimate developer with a desire to make good games, and they succeeded, but Activision came in and corrupted the stuff out of the CoD franchise and treated IW developers like stuff, because Bobby Kotick has no buisness ethics and is just generally an evil, evil man.
QFT

why is it always WW2 and MW type games, WW1 was important why no game son that huh? HUH? (cod7?)

why is it always WW2 and MW type games, WW1 was important why no game son that huh? HUH? (cod7?)
Speak english, please.

Also because WW1 doesn't work well as a game. WW2 works well because it has more modern weapons technology.

Speak english, please.

Also because WW1 doesn't work well as a game. WW2 works well because it has more modern weapons technology.
ww1 = rifles and pistols.
ww2 = rifles and pistols and flamethrowers and machine guns.
mw = heat seeking rocket launchers and jet planes and helicopters with machine guns and tanks and sniper rifles and machine guns with laser sights

I want a Futuristic Warfare  :cookieMonster:

I want a Futuristic Warfare  :cookieMonster:
fw = lasers and thermal nuclear disintegraters and regenerating shields and mechs and mobile robot sentries.
of course, thats just the american army :cookieMonster:

I want a Futuristic Warfare  :cookieMonster:
Battlefiled 2142...........



also yuki, it's because they are about 50 different WW2 games and well idk how many modern warfare based games there are, ya they are fun but they get old after a while, and seeing as there are no known World War 1 games it would be a fresh start...