Bad example.
You mean it'd be like comparing high school basketball to professional baseball.
Doesn't matter the order, but seriously. C&H can get away with more stuff than Dilbert because Dilbert in the paper, where stuff be ultra-conservative and C&H is online where you can do pretty much anything. Also, Scott Adams is in his fifties and writes comics for a fan base comprised mainly of dumpy white guys in dead-end jobs and the guys that write C&H are in their twenties and write for angsty hipster teenagers.
You have to understand that it's hard to compare the two.
