Author Topic: E3 2010  (Read 61983 times)

Hardly, the xbox stuff is so casual oriented that it sucks richards. There's also no way to move freely in a 3D space with natal, move actually has a controller.



Hardly, the xbox stuff is so casual oriented that it sucks richards. There's also no way to move freely in a 3D space with natal, move actually has a controller.
Natal is more intresting then another wii-style controller.
Natal > Sony wand > Wiimote.

The ea newcigarette again.
Xbox motion thingy > Sony wandy thing.
they both suck roosters

Watch this until they continue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd2XDbPSiLM
lol

ah the Japanese, with tasers. You can never explain the japs
« Last Edit: June 14, 2010, 03:28:04 PM by cowmangar »

Natal is hardly interesting, the games for it are awful, move incorporates good graphics with good motion controller mechanics and games that are actually fun, natal is just flailing around with restricted movement and unfun games.

Petting a tiger vs The very high possiblity of a motion controlled elder scrolls game.

il tek dah tigre cuse microsft is col


« Last Edit: November 30, 2012, 10:52:56 PM by HoolyRocket »


physical controllers > nonphysical casualbullstuff

Even if it wasn't about the games, the natal loving sucks, no free movement what so ever, atleast with move you can move around because there's an brown townog stick.

the natal loving sucks
Even when my friend told me about it months ago it sounded like a load of stuff

Even if it wasn't about the games, the natal loving sucks, no free movement what so ever, atleast with move you can move around because there's an brown townog stick.
Flailing around like a handicap isn't free movement?