Author Topic: Is it wrong for a man to shave his legs?  (Read 5384 times)

It's your body, do whatever the forget you want with it. Who cares what someone else thinks?
shameless doublepost

Sounds like the makings of a prostitot

I shave every bit of my body hair, from my legs to my arms to my armpits to my stomach. Shaving legs is pe- Actually wait, never mind, anything I say about this topic will be irrelevant.


When you get older and the hair accumulates, you are going to want to shave that. Just look at my dad when he was a teen and didn't shave cause it was "cool" back then.

Holy Jesus.

shameless doublepost

Sounds like the makings of a prostitot

I didn't doublepost. And it's "Prostitute", by the way. I'm just making a point, though.

Hairy legs ftw >:c

13

I was going to trim my pubic hair in to the shape of a star but it was too much work. D:
12

Really? You want to shave your legs?

Gaaaaaay.

Seriously though. Hairy legs are a sign of masculinity. Pure and simple.

asians aren't real men hurr

13
12
hairy legs run strong in my family

chest hair does not. In all likelihood I will never have noteable chest hair

but I do have hairy legs, and I'm one of the few in my grade who shave regularly.


Also, I'm not 13. I'm 0.

It's not wrong. It's just gay.

But that's okay!

It isn't gay  your only gay if you like men.

Whether or not you want hairy legs is just personal preference. It's no different than shaving your face if you ask me.

Yes. Yes it is.
Whether or not you want hairy legs is just personal preference. It's no different than shaving your face if you ask me.
No, it'd be like if you wanted balls or not. It's the fine line between straight and gay.

No, it'd be like if you wanted balls or not. It's the fine line between straight and gay.

Umm, no.

Leg hair does not produce testosterone.

Umm, no.

Leg hair does not produce testosterone.
No stuff. I mean it is somewhat a masculine symbol.