Poll

Is this a good idea or suggestion?

Yes!
31 (43.1%)
No.
11 (15.3%)
Maybe...
5 (6.9%)
Funny guy needs to get out of this topic
21 (29.2%)
I could model it and script it.
3 (4.2%)
Welknair needs to quit being dumb and get out of my topic so we can comment.
1 (1.4%)

Total Members Voted: 72

Author Topic: AC-130 beacon  (Read 12240 times)

Alright who agrees with this? I'm making a new poll option
You sir are an idiot locking the poll right when Yes is the highest.

Your an idiot. Does a C-130 shoot projectiles? No. Its a Transport freight plane.
The whole idea of having an AC-130 (Wich is a modificated C130) is to have air support without having planes being like flies and swooping down with bullets. Most of the planes dont even heave have weapons, and lag machine? Hell no we just thought of putting a mininuke failbinned for a reason , and a big ass lag machine for the 105 cannon, thats all -_-


You really thing we're going to have bigass projectiles? The 105 cannon should have projectiels no bigger then The bomber blast. And the bofors cannon GSF Carrier cannon would be perfect. And as for the minigun, just use regular bullets at an extremely high rate of fire.
Fixed.
Also , why make an AC130. An airstrike shoots down bullets too. Exept they look like rockets. And they explode. It's just a bullet with a rocket model on it and a big explosion.

For the record, whenever you make a suggestion, it's primary purpose is to see what other people think of the idea in the hopes of attracting an addon maker.

I am entitled to my opinion as much as you are to yours. And my opinion is that this is a bad idea. It just so happens that I can actually support my opinion whereas you have formed no sort of rebuttal.

However, I'm flattered by the poll. It's nice to know that my ideas are having such an impact on this particular idea.



Either way, I think the point is moot. I am reasonably certain that this will never be made.

Well, I think Funny Guy left if that makes you happy. :D
On topic: Even if this was an idea from Mw2, I seriously wouldn't give a crap. What's wrong with a little inspiration?

There is now a poll starring 2 peopole. Be a little more gentle. If this won't be made , thats too bad. It's sad for you , ok , but just live on and try to play Blockland without an AC130. I mean , have you ever stood in a DM with the mind: I need an AC130 now because this airstrike won't do altough it is equally strong?

And seriousley , every person that is not a cigarette/dumb stuff knows that welknair is right.
/support for welknair

On topic: Even if this was an idea from Mw2, I seriously wouldn't give a crap. What's wrong with a little inspiration?
Notice that I haven't once said anything about Mw2. I actually have no prejudices against it. In fact, drawing inspiration from other successful games is a good idea (Just look at all our TF2 addons) as long as those ideas are generally applicable to most players.


/support for welknair

Thank you. =D

There is now a poll starring 2 peopole. Be a little more gentle. If this won't be made , thats too bad. It's sad for you , ok , but just live on and try to play Blockland without an AC130. I mean , have you ever stood in a DM with the mind: I need an AC130 now because this airstrike won't do altough it is equally strong?

And seriousley , every person that is not a cigarette/dumb stuff knows that welknair is right.
/support for welknair

I don't NEED one.I was just asking if anyone would make it

There is now a poll starring 2 peopole. Be a little more gentle. If this won't be made , thats too bad. It's sad for you , ok , but just live on and try to play Blockland without an AC130. I mean , have you ever stood in a DM with the mind: I need an AC130 now because this airstrike won't do altough it is equally strong?

And seriousley , every person that is not a cigarette/dumb stuff knows that welknair is right.
/support for welknair

No he is not.He is not right because he is just trying to derail the topic.

No he is not.He is not right because he is just trying to derail the topic.
How am i trying to derail the topic? I don't think that I have made a single post that wasn't in some way relevant to the topic. I've been discussing my opinions and how they relate to this idea. I believe discussing the original idea is not derailing the topic.

1. This is almost the 5th AC-130 suggestion
2. get back to MW2 if you want one
3. I don't want to get randomley gunned down by a badmin like I am now being done with the Airstrike.

So don't do it for obvious reasons.
4. This has already been done before. you dont need the guns and cannon when it showers something with missiles. GTFO, Lock this, Go cry in your closet

4. This has already been done before. you dont need the guns and cannon when it showers something with missiles. GTFO, Lock this, Go cry in your closet
You are not the boss of me.Insults and controlling words mean nothing to me.Good day.

You are not the boss of me.Insults and controlling words mean nothing to me.Good day.
I notice that you didn't actually address my point in your post. This leads me to believe that you have no adequate response and are just trying to avoid the issue altogether.

Man, that post is so useful.

Man, that post is so useful.
Just please let other people talk T_T

Just please let other people talk T_T
I don't believe I have been silencing anyone.

only do this if you can have a vehicle one too.