AC-130 beacon

[Blockomanian]

Would you mind enlightening me then? Because I honestly don't know what I'm missing. I believe I have accurately assessed what the original post called for, and that role has been filled.
How EXACTLY do you want this beacon to differ from the ones that came before it?

he wants it like the airstrike beacon, exept with the model of a AC-130, and that it shoots down its guns, and flys around for say 10 seconds, shootin crap. thats my interpretation of it.

[Ad Bot]

[Welknair]

Would you mind enlightening me then? Because I honestly don't know what I'm missing. I believe I have accurately assessed what the original post called for, and that role has been filled.
How EXACTLY do you want this beacon to differ from the ones that came before it?

he wants it like the airstrike beacon, exept with the model of a AC-130, and that it shoots down its guns, and flys around for say 10 seconds, shootin crap. thats my interpretation of it.

My point is that that role is effectively done by the existing weapons. If you want players to have the ability to call down air support to attack the designated target, the Air Strike suffices just fine.

[Brickmaster]

My point is that that role is effectively done by the existing weapons. If you want players to have the ability to call down air support to attack the designated target, the Air Strike suffices just fine.

An A-c130 will shoot guns down with gun projectiles.Flares will be like a arm rocket or so,and a rocket projectile for cannons.

[Welknair]

An A-c130 will shoot guns down with gun projectiles.Flares will be like a arm rocket or so,and a rocket projectile for cannons.

So what you're saying is that it's the same as the aforementioned beacons except that it's a little more overpowered and it's a lag machine.

[TheArmyGuy]

So what you're saying is that it's the same as the aforementioned beacons except that it's a little more overpowered and it's a lag machine.

I think it's just that they think it's cooler to have a C130 model with some cilinders sticking out that lag projectiles.

[Brickmaster]

You dumbasses.It shoots guns and rockets down.

[Welknair]

You dumbasses.It shoots guns and rockets down.

That's what I thought it did.

So what's wrong with what we have already?

[tomcat^]

That's what I thought it did.

So what's wrong with what we have already?

Your an idiot. does a C-130 shoot projectiles? no. Its a Transport plane.
The whole idea of having an AC-130 is to have air support without having planes being like flies and swooping down with bullets. most of the planes dont even heave weapons, and lag machine? hell no we just thought of putting a mininuke for the 105 cannon, thats all -_-


you really thing were gunna have bigass projectiles? the 105 cannon should have projectiels no bigger then The bomber blast. and the bofors cannon GSF Carrier cannon would be perfect. and as for the minigun, just use regular bullets at an extremely high rate of fire.

[Welknair]

-Snip-

My original point still stands: This role has been TAKEN. I see no reason why we need another weapon which accomplishes the same task as pre-existing weapons.

From what I can deduce, you want a beacon, that when thrown, calls one or more of these planes to fly over the target and attack it for a short space of time.

This has been made. It's called the airstrike. Have fun.

[U.S. Air Marshall]

Your an idiot. does a C-130 shoot projectiles? no. Its a Transport plane.
The whole idea of having an AC-130 is to have air support without having planes being like flies and swooping down with bullets. most of the planes dont even heave weapons, and lag machine? hell no we just thought of putting a mininuke for the 105 cannon, thats all -_-


you really thing were gunna have bigass projectiles? the 105 cannon should have projectiels no bigger then The bomber blast. and the bofors cannon GSF Carrier cannon would be perfect. and as for the minigun, just use regular bullets at an extremely high rate of fire.

Thank You

My original point still stands: This role has been TAKEN. I see no reason why we need another weapon which accomplishes the same task as pre-existing weapons.

From what I can deduce, you want a beacon, that when thrown, calls one or more of these planes to fly over the target and attack it for a short space of time.

This has been made. It's called the airstrike. Have fun.

You need to GTFO of this Topic befor you think too much and your head explodes. PERIOD!

[Welknair]

You need to GTFO of this Topic befor you think too much and your head explodes. PERIOD!

I notice that you didn't actually address my point in your post. This leads me to believe that you have no adequate response and are just trying to avoid the issue altogether.

[Brickmaster]

I notice that you didn't actually address my point in your post. This leads me to believe that you have no adequate response and are just trying to avoid the issue altogether.

All your trying to do is ruin this topic with you trying to be "smart" and your stopping people from wanting to support this topic so you get it all.Just get out of my topic and let others decide.

[Welknair]

All your trying to do is ruin this topic with you trying to be "smart" and your stopping people from wanting to support this topic so you get it all.Just get out of my topic and let others decide.

I notice that you didn't actually address my point in your post. This leads me to believe that you have no adequate response and are just trying to avoid the issue altogether.

[U.S. Air Marshall]

dude hes the origbrown town poster

[Brickmaster]

All your trying to do is ruin this topic with you trying to be "smart" and your stopping people from wanting to support this topic so you get it all.Just get out of my topic and let others decide.

Alright who agrees with this? Im making a new poll option