Rockstar's plans for Red Dead Redemption DLC

[Rocketttdog]

oh boy more of a reason for me to spend money

[Ad Bot]

[Solid]

Both the PS3 and 360 have its limits.

But the PS3 is far superior to the 360 hardware/spec wise. :/

[chaseyqurt]

The PS3 version looks bad compared to it. Stretched textures, it's blurry, smaller draw distance, glitchy shadows, etc.

What? It's the opposite, the 360 version has bad aliasing compared to the PS3 version and overall just looks worse.

[Snaffle J. Bean]

What? It's the opposite, the 360 version has bad aliasing compared to the PS3 version and overall just looks worse.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=19855

ps3 is blurry and missing some shadows and foliage and etc.

[Rocketttdog]

I think its because alot of games are made for the PC first and then they are ported to 360 and PS3, and it goes VERY smoothly to 360 while it is tough going to the PS3.

[Snaffle J. Bean]

http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=19855

ps3 is blurry and missing some shadows and foliage and etc.

hardcore evidence here, ps3cigarettes

dont ignore it

[Solid]

I think its because alot of games are made for the PC first and then they are ported to 360 and PS3, and it goes VERY smoothly to 360 while it is tough going to the PS3.

Red Dead Redemption wasn't made for the PC, only 360 and PS3.

But yeah, it was probably made on the 360 and roughly ported to the PS3.

[Marcem]

Yeah, look at games like uncharted 2, that's some pretty nice looking stuff.  When it's designed for PS3 it can look really, really nice.

[A.R.C.]

god
the loving zombie cliche
god damn it

Cowboys and zombies.
So loving awesome!