I was watching the news yesterday, and I saw something that caught my eye. In Mehlville, Missouri, The Mehlville School Superintendent Terry Noble was about to retire. But before then, the Mehlville School Board President, Tom Diehl, gave Terry Noble a $44,080 raise to keep him from retiring. A reporter interviewed Tom Diehl, so I decided to write what they said on a piece of paper.
So you gave him forty-four thousand dollars so he wouldn't retire? Is that what your saying? And then you say, "Oh we want to keep him working and give him another forty-four thousand dollars". Is that what you're saying?
When you boil it down, you can say that.
Do you believe tax payers should like this deal?
My descision and the descision of this board isn't based on how the tax payers feel.
What do you think of it? Share about how you feel of it, here, on what Tom Diehl said.
