Author Topic: The Weapons Stereotype Thread  (Read 118265 times)

People at my school know their guns.

Woo, the south.

Sadly, I hail from central Alabama. therefore i am not a "redneck" and know nothing about guns except what i am told of them.  :cookieMonster:

Thanks for educating me yuki

I hardly know stuff about guns c:


One
Lol

"Call of duty is the most realistic game. Their interpretation of combat and weapons is like real life."

What one of my friends said.

You can shoot someone in the stomach with an L96 AWM in CoD black ops, and they can still sprint away like nothing happened.

I noticed two things in MW2 multiplayer modes,
The somewhat armored TF141 take the same damage as a person on the militia, who are clad in only soccer shirts.
The spetznas and other non american teams have NATO weapons.

Also, being picky, the l69a1 had damage multipliers (another reason CoD is bullstuff realistic) that give it a one hit kill on the stomach up. c:


Also, can you explain the g11 for me, it's confusing.

Meekl for forgets sake remove that link.

Also, can you explain the g11 for me, it's confusing.

Basically, the bullet is stored in a cartridge that is made of primer and propellant, so when it is fired, the propellant and primer basically disappear and the bullet is ejected, no cartridge needed. It was a prototype weapon that never saw mass-production or actual military use, though.

I have a (probable) stupid question about Rocket Propelled Grenades, can they actually not explode if they hit something at close range

or is that just video game logic?

I think as long as it hits something relatively solid (not paper for instance) it should explode no matter the range.

I have a (probable) stupid question about Rocket Propelled Grenades, can they actually not explode if they hit something at close range

or is that just video game logic?
Video game logic. As long as the warhead hits something solid, it detonates.

Video game logic. As long as the warhead hits something solid, it detonates.
However, GTA IV put a more realistic "spin" on RPG's, so if they hit a wall at a low angle, they deflect of the wall rather than explode immediately.
Plus, they actually spin, and fly straight. Not fly straight 10 feet then suddenly curve up.



I have always loved this rifle since I was like 11.

imo It is a beautiful rifle. I want one

Are these legal to own?

-snip-
I heard it is a rotating bolt or something. Is it something like the p90 feeding system?


The L69 family is so loving lovey.


I have always loved this rifle since I was like 11.

imo It is a beautiful rifle. I want one

Are these legal to own?
Er, We can't really say if it's legal or not because we don't know where you live, and the laws vary quite a bit around the world (And even in individual states of country's)

This has probably been mentioned before, but what exactly makes magnum rounds different than non-magnum rounds?

This has probably been mentioned before, but what exactly makes magnum rounds different than non-magnum rounds?
Magnum refers to the size of the cartridge. There isn't a .357 non-magnum, for example.
Quote
A magnum cartridge is a firearm cartridge larger than, or derived from, a similar cartridge. A magnum firearm is one using such a cartridge. For example:
[edit]Handguns
The .357 Magnum
The .41 Remington Magnum
The .44 Magnum
The .475 Wildey Magnum
The .500 S&W Magnum
[edit]Rifles
The .338 Lapua Magnum
The 7 mm Remington Magnum
The .22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire
Many other magnum cartridges appear in List of rifle cartridges.

I have always loved this rifle since I was like 11.

imo It is a beautiful rifle. I want one

Are these legal to own?
From what I see, they're mostly in military service, I imagine that if you're in the states you could get one by pulling strings or find a civilian model (this is probably the case, the British L85 is non-existant on the civilian market, but Prexis are making a kit for civvies to buy and assemble.)


I heard it is a rotating bolt or something. Is it something like the p90 feeding system?
It is somewhat, the P90 has a magazine where the rounds are aligned at 90 degrees horizontally to the chamber, and are rotated into place by a mechanism in the frontmost portion of the magazine which rotates them to face the chamber and prepares them to be stripped off. The G11 has a similar magazine where the rounds are rotated 90 degrees vertically, and the complex internals rotate and chamber the caseless round. Here is a diagram, the orange-yellow mass is the bolt/loading group, and to everyone illiterate to clockworks/engineering, it looks as if the G11 has been raped by a swiss clock, I imagine it's complexity doesn't make it terribly attractive in jungle/desert conditions, where it all might lock up.
On top of that, fully automatic fire is limited to bursts, as there is no case to carry some residual heat out, and despite the higher flash point of the propellant, it's likely that firing a long burst would temporarily heat the barrel up enough to cause the weapon to fire prematurely, potentially damaging those precious mechanics.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2011, 04:35:38 PM by Deathwish »