Poll

Should he be banned?

Yes
73 (74.5%)
No
25 (25.5%)

Total Members Voted: 98

Author Topic: Should JamesTheLeet be banned?  (Read 8744 times)

That's your opinion, not fact. And Minecraft was just an example.

There is nothing wrong with being a furry. He has every right to like it. He's not spreading furry research around, so there's nothing about it that should offend you; unless of course you like to be closed minded.

This is supposed to be a free country, right? If you don't think we should have the right to like what we want, you're a Republican or a hypocrite.

HEY

HEY GUYS I HAVE A SPECIAL HAT, I AM A BETTER THAN YOU AND IF YOU INSULT ME I AM WOULD BE MORALLY CORECTTER THAN YOU HA

Yes, let's let Zoophytes have love with animals too! Let's let everyone run wild.

And it's not solely my opinion, it's looked down upon by society in general.

I should think the average citizen would find it mentally unstable, which it is, to either:

A. Get loveually aroused by humanesque animals
B. Want to have intercourse with said animals
C. Think you are one of said animals
D. Dress up in fursuits and have love

There's a difference between Zoophilia and Homoloveuality.

Yet It doesn't matter in this topic because this is about the forum copy yet most people don't get this for some reason.

When did any of us insinuate he was gay?

Christ's sake After the "Should Niven Be Unbanned" Topic all people make exactly same topic for Should "name" be banned/Unbanned" Christ's sake people the votings are not going to change anything

I think furrys should be burned for fuel. Since they don't wish to be human, their human rights are nulled. More fuel for thought!

Yes, let's let Zoophytes have love with animals too! Let's let everyone run wild.

And it's not solely my opinion, it's looked down upon by society in general.

I should think the average citizen would find it mentally unstable, which it is, to either:

A. Get loveually aroused by humanesque animals
B. Want to have intercourse with said animals
C. Think you are one of said animals
D. Dress up in fursuits and have love


Now you're putting words in my mouth, I never said bestiality was okay.

"national socialists have a right to hate blacks." does not mean "national socialists have a right to kill blacks."

Being a furry doesn't mean you want to go out and start loving stray cats. If it's not causing anyone any harm, it's not a problem. If JamesTheLeet starts talking about that, then we have a problem.

You know being gay or being black used to be looked down upon by society in general too, but this is a progressive society. Some Christians still think gays are mentally unstable.

Don't think I'm saying you don't have a right to hate furries, cause you do, but the key difference here is the discrimination.

Oh look a furry

BAN IT OH GOD BAN IT OOOH GOOOD GET IT OFF


jesus christ why do you bitch about everything


OGM SOMEBODY POSTED AN INTERNET THING

BAN HIM BAN HIM

OH NO SOMEBODY POSTED A COMIC I'M NOT INERESTED IN

BAN HIM BAN HIM


OH GOD SOMEBODY GOT UNBANNED

BAN HIM BAN HIM

I think furrys should be burned for fuel. Since they don't wish to be human, their human rights are nulled. More fuel for thought!

To further my point, when being gay wasn't accepted at all, nobody would have a problem with this:

"I think gays should be burned for fuel. Since they don't wish to be straight, their human rights are nulled. More fuel for thought!"

Oh look a furry

BAN IT OH GOD BAN IT OOOH GOOOD GET IT OFF


jesus christ why do you bitch about everything


OGM SOMEBODY POSTED AN INTERNET THING

BAN HIM BAN HIM

OH NO SOMEBODY POSTED A COMIC I'M NOT INERESTED IN

BAN HIM BAN HIM


OH GOD SOMEBODY GOT UNBANNED

BAN HIM BAN HIM
The forums described in 10 lines.

Well no it doesn't because being a furry is an incredibly dolled up form of bestiality.

Take, for example, two pictures of a tiger.
One from the wild, one anthropomorphic. Are they both not animals?
Does wanting to have love with the latter make it ok?

And using national socialists was a poor example because society also looks down on national socialists. It's a shame they have any rights in this country.

And yes, I understand that being gay and black was looked down upon in society (I myself don't like gays) but there are certain things that should never be accepted, like child enthusiasts or national socialists.

oh and by internet thing i mean the "click to give an internet"

To further my point, when being gay wasn't accepted at all, nobody would have a problem with this:

"I think gays should be burned for fuel. Since they don't wish to be straight, their human rights are nulled. More fuel for thought!"
But they're still humans so it doesn't make much sense/as clever.

Oh look a furry

BAN IT OH GOD BAN IT OOOH GOOOD GET IT OFF


jesus christ why do you bitch about everything


OGM SOMEBODY POSTED AN INTERNET THING

BAN HIM BAN HIM

OH NO SOMEBODY POSTED A COMIC I'M NOT INERESTED IN

BAN HIM BAN HIM


OH GOD SOMEBODY GOT UNBANNED

BAN HIM BAN HIM

Someone has a forum

BAN HIM BAN HIM


oh and by internet thing i mean the "click to give an internet"