Religious Knowledge Survey: Atheists and Agnostics Score the Highest

[dkamm65]

Pull out of my ass?
Haha, no.
I'll pull these things out of my brain.

1. If life started in the ocean like Evolution says it did, amino acids would have to come together to form life. However, water seperates amino acids making them unable to make life evolve in water.
2. According to Evolution, the Big Bang was spinning. If it was spinning when it exploded, everything comming out of it would spin the same direction. However, we have planets, orbits and even entire galaxys spinning the opposite direction.
3. If the weaker became better and the others died off, why do some of them survive to get better? Wouldn't they all die?

Man, if I puled those out of my ass my ass must be smart.

I was actually laughing out loud to myself while reading this. Where did you get this list, Conservapedia? lol

It pretty apparent you have no idea what you're talking about.

1. I know you aren't a biologist, so unless you can cite research concerning the processes involved in the formation of life that explicitly states that, I have no reason to even pay it any attention.

2. Yet again, you're not an astrophysicist, so that's also pulled out of your ass. Do a little research on the formation if stars and planets before making such laughable statements.

3. Natural selection

[Ad Bot]

[Altered]

Not a big difference there! o u


So life didn't start underwater. Evolution says it did and the other options in your religion suck

Or maybe they evolved differently Because you were there and you know.

Not exactly. Read what you just typed again. I did.

Why would they keep spinning, or maybe our galaxy is still spinning.


Yeah you're a dumbass. Afraid to answer the question? Also, I'm not a dumbass because I got straight A+'s in school and continue to do so while homeschooled.

I was actually laughing out loud to myself while reading this. Where did you get this list, Conservapedia? lol Doesn't exist; if you were smart you'd know.

It pretty apparent you have no idea what you're talking about.

1. I know you aren't a biologist, so unless you can cite research concerning the processes involved in the formation of life that explicitly states that, I have no reason to even pay it any attention. Niether are you. And I get my research from a Christian biologist/scientest while you get yours from people who have different theorys and ideals about evolution..

2. Yet again, you're not an astrophysicist, so that's also pulled out of your ass. Do a little research on the formation if stars and planets before making such laughable statements. Same as above. And you didn't answer my question. You rambled on about the formation of things when I was talking about spinning stuff.

3. Natural selection Cool! Is that like the Director in L4D? Because natural selection and the director are obviously thinking minds who use cruel tactics to make things better.

All in all I have no reason to belive Evolution and if you did belive in it you'd just let me die and not go anywhere but a coffin.

[Solid]

I've de-converted some kids at my school to atheism / agnosticism.

I feel proud.

[Bisjac]

even if there is a god and he did in fact create everything.

Christians STILL dont want to know how.

the bible is pretty vague on the process of god creating things. no one is to say he didnt actually snap it into existence.
but people of faith would rather not learn about the world they live in. life is easier and safer if you believe in magic.

[Solid]

If God is real though I'm pretty sure he didn't want people to take the bible literally.

[Bisjac]

If God is real though I'm pretty sure he didn't want people to take the bible literally.

im sure a real god would take offense to having all the creed and history written down in a book, and taken as scripture.
that would be extremely dangerous and unhelpful.

[dkamm65]

Doesn't exist; if you were smart you'd know.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

And I get my research from a Christian biologist/scientest while you get yours from people who have different theorys and ideals about evolution.

Christian biologist? LOL Who should somebody trust more, a biologist that is simply looking for truth as presented by research and evidence; or a Christian biologist who's based one way, and will throw away hours of research if it doesn't fit his beliefs? Seems like an easy choice to me.

Same as above. And you didn't answer my question. You rambled on about the formation of things when I was talking about spinning stuff.

You didn't ask a question. You spewed some absurd line while proving you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. Even if what you wrote was from an article somewhere, you clearly didn't understand it.

Natural selection Cool! Is that like the Director in L4D? Because natural selection and the director are obviously thinking minds who use cruel tactics to make things better.

You asked how natural selection works so I give you something that will explain it, and you completely ignore it. If you're not even going to entertain the idea of even glancing over what I reply with, I'm not even going to argue with you. I'd have an easier time convincing a grapefruit.

[Flying Ace]

woo I'm going to stay out of this argument just one point of advice though




no one use the tactic of saying natural selection is evolution cause it isn't 

[dkamm65]

woo I'm going to stay out of this argument just one point of advice though




no one use the tactic of saying natural selection is evolution cause it isn't 

Evolution is regarded as fact by the scientific community in one form or another. Evolution through natural selection is still considered a theory.

[Bisjac]

lol a "christian biologist"?

A christian biologist would hate to be called that. it implies right away that he is biased, and his studies are already untrusted.

he would want the whole of the scientific community to respect his studies.
if his studies lead toward creationism fine. if not, fine.

you are telling us he doesn't use the scientific process or something?
why would being christian even be relevant?

[Skele]

lol a "christian biologist"?

A christian biologist would hate to be called that. it implies right away that he is biased, and his studies are already untrusted.

he would want the whole of the scientific community to respect his studies.
if his studies lead toward creationism fine. if not, fine.

you are telling us he doesn't use the scientific process or something?
why would being christian even be relevant?

It's only relevance is proving to us that Altered is following a biased opinion and knows he is?

[Ladios]

Wah I only got 80% of the questions right :(

[Bisjac]

Wah I only got 80% of the questions right :(

you should only feel bad if you are of faith.

religious people SHOULD be responsible for knowing their own creed and their own history. but usually they dont.

[Ladios]

I got the question about the great awakening thingy wrong. :/
And the Ramadan thing.

[Colten]