Author Topic: Taking Vehicle Suggestions  (Read 146592 times)

Two ideas:

A shopping cart (lol)
Rollerskates (like skis, but faster and accelerate on flat ground)

I would like a police car.
granted

Rollerskates (like skis, but faster and accelerate on flat ground)
Skis do accelerate on flat ground.

Skis do accelerate on flat ground.
Orly?

Seriously, if I knew how to make them faster, it'd be more fun with say, a skatepark.

This Car (bloko-tized) :
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo376.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo381.jpg

Mounts: driver seat, Passenger seat, and inside cargo box.

Note: Spare wheel on back spins freely.



This Biplane (bloko-tized):
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo421.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo422.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo424.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo425.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo427.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/PictureorVideo429.jpg
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a141/Azukki/planelandinggear.gif

Mounts: Driver Seat, Passenger seat, Left-top wing, Right-top wing, Left-bottom wing, Right-bottom wing ( lots of gunners >:D )

Note: landing gear wheels fold down for landing automatically when you get near the ground. Cannons work as a custom weapon that you can't use unless you're inside the plane, piloting it.



I might just try to make the car myself if no-one else does.

Flame Face

  • Guest
Don't know if it has been said but a blimp.

*4-8 seatings
* the air bag with station on bottom type
* weapons would be kind of cool

* anything else you can think of

fishpen0

  • Guest
Yes, and this "blimp" should hold about 50 people and be filled with hydrogen and covered in rocket fuel.

fishpen0

  • Guest
I know it was just a poorly constructed slightly morbid joke.

It should be filled with helium so it wouldn't do the Hindenburgs.

I would like a police car.
granted
can  u plz post that so we can have it plz i want to drive it into stuffs

I would like a police car.
granted
can  u plz post that so we can have it plz i want to drive it into stuffs
It was just a police car built from bricks, not a real drivable vehicle. :|

It should be filled with helium so it wouldn't do the Hindenburg.
The Hindenburg did *NOT* go down from the hydrogen.  This has been pretty much proven.  The reason it burned up is because the doping material (the stuff used to reflect light and heat, and all that) was made from aluminum shavings, and a static electricity buildup.  In other words, the entire bladder was covered in a rudimentary form of rocket fuel.  When the static electricity discharged, it lit the doping compound on fire, which burned extremely quickly.  If you watch the videos of it burning, you'll see that the blimp itself was still in the air, even though more than half of the structure was completely engulfed in flames.  If the hydrogen is what was burning, there's no way the thing could have stayed in the air as long as it did.

Yes, I saw this on TV.  It was a really cool program.  Anyway, I just thought I'd clear that up.  In truth, the Germans (who built the Hindenburg) had figured out how to handle hydrogen quite safely.  Someone built a model of their safety measures, and tried to get the hydrogen to light, and all of the failsafes worked exactly as planned.  Meaning, they were unable to get the hydrogen to burn inside (or even outside) the bladder.  So, all things considered, hydrogen might actually be a very useful form of fuel, if handled properly.

I hope you learned something from this brief write-up.  Mouser X over and out.

fishpen0

  • Guest
It should be filled with helium so it wouldn't do the Hindenburg.
The Hindenburg did *NOT* go down from the hydrogen.  This has been pretty much proven.  The reason it burned up is because the doping material (the stuff used to reflect light and heat, and all that) was made from aluminum shavings, and a static electricity buildup.  In other words, the entire bladder was covered in a rudimentary form of rocket fuel.  When the static electricity discharged, it lit the doping compound on fire, which burned extremely quickly.  If you watch the videos of it burning, you'll see that the blimp itself was still in the air, even though more than half of the structure was completely engulfed in flames.  If the hydrogen is what was burning, there's no way the thing could have stayed in the air as long as it did.

Yes, I saw this on TV.  It was a really cool program.  Anyway, I just thought I'd clear that up.  In truth, the Germans (who built the Hindenburg) had figured out how to handle hydrogen quite safely.  Someone built a model of their safety measures, and tried to get the hydrogen to light, and all of the failsafes worked exactly as planned.  Meaning, they were unable to get the hydrogen to burn inside (or even outside) the bladder.  So, all things considered, hydrogen might actually be a very useful form of fuel, if handled properly.

I hope you learned something from this brief write-up.  Mouser X over and out.

This was established several posts up. I'm so sorry for even making that joke. This post has careened off topic now...

This was established several posts up. I'm so sorry for even making that joke. This post has careened off topic now...
Yes, I agree that it was.  However, the person I quoted made their post after yours.  And with what they said, I am lead to understand that they were unaware of the actual cause of the disaster.  So I cleared it up.  Hopefully so completely that no one else will make a similar mistake in information.

Sorry to have gotten this off-topic, but there's very little I find worth posting about here.  I felt clarification was needed, so I provided.

As for vehicle suggestions, how about a flying car?  As in, one that stared in a movie in the late 80's?  I know there's already a topic about this, but I figured Packer could do a better job.  That is my opinion of course.  I have very little to base that on, since I don't know the person who's working in the other thread.  Packer though, I'm familiar with.

I'm sure someone else can come up with a better suggestion, but I figured it couldn't hurt to *try* to get this back on topic.  Mouser X over and out.