Author Topic: Processor question.  (Read 845 times)

If my processor says its 2.20GHz would that be higher or lower than 2.4?

2.20 is lower than 2.4.

It's obviously lower, but you also have to take the number of cores into account between both processors.

A quad core 2.20 GHz processor might perform better than a Dual core 2.40 GHz processor on most applications, especially if you like to multi-task.

*Sigh*

It's obviously lower, but you also have to take the number of cores into account between both processors.

A quad core 2.20 GHz processor might perform better than a Dual core 2.40 GHz processor on most applications, especially if you like to multi-task.

Your statement is invalid.
It's lower.


*Sigh*

Your statement is invalid.
It's lower.

No he's right. A quad @ 2.2GHz is faster than a duo @ 2.4GHz.

No he's right. A quad @ 2.2GHz is faster than a duo @ 2.4GHz.

I know. But he said that a 2.20 GHz is more than a 2.4 GHz.

EDIT: I could of mis-understood what he said though. It's been a long day.
I'll see what I think tomorrow.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2010, 12:20:33 AM by steve5451 »

I know. But he said that a 2.20 GHz is more than a 2.4 GHz.

No he didn't. Find the spot in that post where he said that.


Yeah, my brains not working right. It's been a long day. I thought he meant that the 2.4 GHz was lower.


Depends on the gpu, but it should run it, yes.

What are you handicapped?

2.2 WILL ALWAYS BE LESS THAN 2.4? DId you fail math in 2nd grade or sumtin?

What are you handicapped?

2.2 WILL ALWAYS BE LESS THAN 2.4? DId you fail math in 2nd grade or sumtin?

Mathematically yes.

Processorwise, no.

A quadcore 2.2 is more powerful than a dual core 2.4.

That's like saying 4 gigs of ddr2 ram is equal to 3.5 gigs of ddr3 ram.

Mathematically yes.

Processorwise, no.

A quadcore 2.2 is more powerful than a dual core 2.4.

That's like saying 4 gigs of ddr2 ram is equal to 3.5 gigs of ddr3 ram.

Waitwut. My head asploded.