Poll

Online file storage like Google Drive? (monthly prices)

50GB ($3.00)
41 (11.2%)
100GB ($4.50)
17 (4.7%)
250GB ($7.50)
10 (2.7%)
500GB ($12.50)
7 (1.9%)
750GB ($16)
6 (1.6%)
1TB ($20)
30 (8.2%)
2-8TB (proportional to 1TB price)
0 (0%)
8-16TB (proportional to 1TB price)
43 (11.8%)
Prices too high (READ)
44 (12.1%)
No desire
167 (45.8%)

Total Members Voted: 365

Author Topic: Kaphost Blockland Servers  (Read 654228 times)

Basing my whole argument on the average ping from multiple locations worldwide over a 6 month period, I'd say that's good, reliable evidence.
Not at all. If you were hosting 1 server on that machine, then yes. But what about when you start gaining clients? Again, that glorious ping won't be as attractive to gloat about anymore.

Yes. It is true that the RTB Panel does more at the moment. But what does it come down to? Vanity, or the actual service?

Again, not sure you know what vanity means. The fact that the RTB Panel does more means the service is more comprehensive and fully featured. Functionality is not vanity.

Not at all. If you were hosting 1 server on that machine, then yes. But what about when you start gaining clients? Again, that glorious ping won't be as attractive to gloat about anymore.

I don't think you know much about what the ping is a measure of, but it certainly isn't going to dramatically increase when we host more servers. I'm not sure where you got that idea - are you pulling things out of your ass?

Again, not sure you know what vanity means. The fact that the RTB Panel does more means the service is more comprehensive and fully featured. Functionality is not vanity.

I don't think you know much about what the ping is a measure of, but it certainly isn't going to dramatically increase when we host more servers. I'm not sure where you got that idea - are you pulling things out of your ass?
Functionality in your case means a bunch of nice features, that in reality have nothing to do with the actual hosting. Features are great, but can be replicated by anyone. So I wouldn't talk to loudly about them.

That's almost preemptive to me. Again, just wait until you start getting clients, and they start hosting. Then we'll talk about ping.

Kalphiter has over 40 servers. You have 1. Not your room to talk.

Basing my whole argument on the average ping from multiple locations worldwide over a 6 month period, I'd say that's good, reliable evidence.
Hmmm, I wonder how you measured the ping.

Ha, Pingdom is a joke, it's inaccurate.

Functionality in your case means a bunch of nice features, that in reality have nothing to do with the actual hosting. Features are great, but can be replicated by anyone. So I wouldn't talk to loudly about them.

Your arguments are so flawed. Anyone can replicate features? Anyone can buy a server from the same provider as someone else. I don't see what your point is there. Buying a server takes money and that's it - implementing features takes considerable time, effort and advanced knowledge.

That's almost preemptive to me. Again, just wait until you start getting clients, and they start hosting. Then we'll talk about ping.

Kalphiter has over 40 servers. You have 1. Not your room to talk.

I think you missed what I said about ping - which is that it's hardly related to how many people you're hosting. Again, I can't see what point you're trying to make here given that fact. Do you have some sort of evidence to cause you to believe ping goes up with the number of servers you host, or are you just making wild assumptions?

If ping goes up with the number of people on Kalph's server, if he shut them all down but one then I should get a nice 20ms from London right?
« Last Edit: November 15, 2012, 04:51:46 PM by Ephialtes »

Again, just wait until you start getting clients, and they start hosting. Then we'll talk about ping.
Clearly you're talking out of your ass. Ping is the amount of time it takes for a packet to reach the destination and ACK back to you. It will only increase if you have insufficient bandwidth, which I don't think these servers will have.

Love how only 2 real arguments against Lub's service have cropped up. First everyone was saying Lub hadn't released anything, which was a pretty sensible point. Then Lub posted the topic and suddenly that was invalid. Still a few people decided they had to choose something to cling to, so they picked "Lub hasn't released it yet! There's still a chance it might be bad!" What's gonna happen come December first? That's pretty much the end of the line for bashing Lub without needing to come up with some real criticism. Maybe they'll start saying Kalphiter's service has blast processing or something, I dunno.

Maybe they'll start saying Kalphiter's service has blast processing or something, I dunno.

Kalphiter PLEASE tell me your service has blast processing. That would DESTROY lubs service before he can even release it.

The new panel looks pretty good, keep up the work.

Also, may I post a picture of it to ask a question?




What is the Minecraft icon for? Will you be hosting Minecraft servers in the future?

Damn, forgot to remove that.

Damn, forgot to remove that.
oh my god lol he used a template
what a joke

oh my god lol he used a template
what a joke
am I the only one who doesn't give a stuff about this

oh my god lol he used a template
what a joke
That's a custom image I threw in there for fun, forgettard.