Author Topic: reading the roblox news, i lol'd hard.  (Read 1952 times)

Roblox actually has decent physics. You're one of those people that believes one of the games is superior to the other, aren't you? You need to realize they both master different things. Piss off.
Trying to play the well-rounded peacekeeper who likes both games doesn't work when one of them is a lazily developed, half-broken, laggy mess of an application.

Shouldn't even require stating.
"LULULUL I'MMA PRETEND TO BE A TROLL AND GET ATTENTION"

What?

This isn't trolling, nor attention, if i wanted attention i'd wave my E-peen around in haven and hearth forums, its just a mention of how they are acting handicapped by using memes, they've done it 500 gazillion times.

Trying to play the well-rounded peacekeeper who likes both games doesn't work when one of them is a lazily developed, half-broken, laggy mess of an application.

I must agree with you, i dislike roblox, though i still liked the physics, that is all i liked about it, and just a bit more customastion, which doesn't matter as it isn't a barbie-dressup contest.

No, you're stupid, being an ass for no reason doesn't make you cool.

No, you're stupid, being an ass for no reason doesn't make you cool.

Half of us, no ALL of us, have been a ass for no reason or the other, plus you need to stop being a peacekeeper and attempt to enforce 4chan

have a nice day

~whatevaguy

I must agree with you, i dislike roblox, though i still liked the physics, that is all i liked about it, and just a bit more customastion, which doesn't matter as it isn't a barbie-dressup contest.
The physics engine is totally unimpressive. I grew up looking at neat softbody physics tech demos made by independent programmers, and remembering ones from like 2005, Roblox is on par.

The physics engine is totally unimpressive. I grew up looking at neat softbody physics tech demos made by independent programmers, and remembering ones from like 2005, Roblox is on par.

i dont play alot of physics game, please do tell some of these examples.

and they have better physics, which DOES not mean it's good

What's wrong with Roblox trying to get better? I see it as an improvement.

That statement in the quote just seems conceited.

That statement in the quote just seems conceited.
I honestly see no problem with it.

They're updating their physics so it's more lifelike. I mean, I can't judge Roblox. I have a Mac, and I have never played Roblox. But from what I hear, their physics sucks. So they're updating it, I would think that's good? :o

I guess, if they had said they will be the best...

Being a player of the game, i can firmly say the new sounds sucks.
They are actually just sound effects played at a high/low pitch depending on how hard the impact was, or how big the object is, and it sounds like a ping pong ball.

Roblox actually has decent physics. You're one of those people that believes one of the games is superior to the other, aren't you? You need to realize they both master different things. Piss off.
every brick bounces like rubber and drops way too fast unless it's lagging.

It has better shadows then us,we have to give it that.


I like roblox's physics but I belive that source has better physics.
It's not Source's physics, it's Havok's.