Author Topic: evolution  (Read 12216 times)

That's microevolution; minor changes. You're not going from a dog to hippo or a bird to a weasel, you're going from a cat to a cat (example of a civilized animal). And a dog to a dog.

The evolution you're trying to prove is macroevolution.
That's because we can't view millions of years in a short amount of time. Slight mutations over time that are more ideal for an organism's current environment tend to stay around because it helped in some way, therefore, breeding to create more with that mutation. Over time, so much mutation can occur that it changes it completely from what it was before. Dog breeding is just interspecies. There is no predators, they just do what they want because their environment is safe. Even though colors of fur, or shapes of skeleton change from breeds, it's nothing really different from a dog, because the amount of mutations needed to change it to something a lot different take a long time since animals tend to live quite a while, and mutations are very small. I bet you money that species in the wild right now are still changing, and still evolving, but it's so hard to notice, because mutations are so minuscule.

Any scientific "law" can be proven false with enough quality counterexamples, no matter how much it is accepted by scientists. This includes evolution.

"Science is not done by majority rule; it is done by experiment."
Do you mean Einstein's theory of relativity, or the graviton theory? Either could be false (but both can't be true; they are mutually exclusive). If science is always "moving ahead", incorrect theories have to be eliminated, no matter how big their following is or how "mentally disabled" its opponents are.
Where did that small piece of matter come from?
I feel that this kinda contradicts counterexamples, because they are just examples. It sounds to me, how you worded it, that enough examples or made up ideas can prove a theory false. That sounds like a majority rule of examples.
By the way, Steven Hawking is not mentally crippled. He can't move because of ALS, which doesn't effect thoughts. It only keeps him from moving.

forget the scientific community!


They made Pluto a Dwarf Planet.  :c
They were nice enough to keep it as a 'planet' by creating the 'dwarf planet' subclass.

anyway azerath thanks for doing what i could never have done

Jesus loving christ I can't believe there is still an argument on this. We can literally see evolution take place throughout the millions of years, fossils showing subtle changes. Even in the Galapagos we can see birds go through a natural selection process in a few months.

I don't care how full your head is of Catholic stuff that your mothers and fathers force-fed to keep your "souls" pure and your path away from evil, evolution is an accepted theory by the scientific community.
Actually, Catholics accept evolution. It's fundamentalists that you're thinking of (there are others, but all of you seem to be insisting that Christianity is the only religion out there).

Actually, Catholics accept evolution. It's fundamentalists that you're thinking of (there are others, but all of you seem to be insisting that Christianity is the only religion out there).
It's the most main stream religion. I guarantee you most of the people on this forum are either that or have no religion at all.

It's the most main stream religion. I guarantee you most of the people on this forum are either that or have no religion at all.
Yes, I find this very interesting.
Of all the qualities common in the players of this game, what attracts skeptics like us or those capable of becoming skeptics to this game?

anyway azerath thanks for doing what i could never have done
What? You could have done that. :P

Christcigarettes will never give up. Just learn to accept that.
Hahaha, I've stated several times that the theory of creation does not contradict evolution. The only argument that is going on is because you guys are too ignorant to realize that this topic is on evolution, not theism.

One could argue that those two theories are contradictory and deserve to be mentioned in order to establish one or the other, but I've already said they are not contradictory. The time for mentioning creationism is over.

Maybe you don't account for every single Christian in existence.
MAYBE.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2011, 11:40:58 AM by The Titanium »

Agnosticism is wonderful. It's like you can silence an argument with it.

"Hey world, it's absolutely impossible to know who's right!"


"Hey world, it's absolutely impossible to know who's right!"
no it isnt


i thought agnosticism was about saying that 'i cant say that god exists given what i know so far'
while atheism is the conclusion that there is none

Yes, I find this very interesting.
Of all the qualities common in the players of this game, what attracts skeptics like us or those capable of becoming skeptics to this game?
Because it is aimed more so towards nonspecific youth, who are typically open to new ideals and/or rebellious agianst old ones. :o

Sue me.
Clearly you have not heard of the concept of "Burden of proof".