Modern Warfare 2: "For The Record"

[Fire paw]

Not everyone runs around quickscoping. It's not illegal to camp with a sniper.

I do :D

[Ad Bot]

[Messes]

I do :D

I do a combination of both, depending on the map and what the other team is doing.

[Night Fox]

The campaign is the part people don't complain about.

[Duckmeister]

Okay, let's face the facts here.

Who plays Call of Duty for the singleplayer?  The only ones worth playing alone were the first and second one, both in WW2.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare had an excellent story, that was presented well, but it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was great.

World at War was just all around a terrible game.

Modern Warfare 2 had an unbelievably stupid story, that was still presented well, but again, it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was okay (not as good as 4, see "no dedicated servers", "overpowered perks/weapons").

Black Ops had an unbelievably stupid story, that was presented terribly, but it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was great (goes back to what made 4 good, and removes stopping power/martyrdom/juggernaut-type perks).

So, Black Ops has the best multiplayer, Call of Duty 4 was one of the best games of its time, and the rest of them (except 1 and 2) either suck, or simply aren't as good.

[ChexGuy331]

I think it's fun, but definitely not worth the money.

that free weekend was so long ago...

[Ki Oreo]

Okay, let's face the facts here.

Who plays Call of Duty for the singleplayer?  The only ones worth playing alone were the first and second one, both in WW2.

me

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare had an excellent story, that was presented well, but it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was great.

/agree

World at War was just all around a terrible game.

Yea, there were no ACOG's to Qu1cKsC0P3 N00bs with

Modern Warfare 2 had an unbelievably stupid story, that was still presented well, but again, it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was okay (not as good as 4, see "no dedicated servers", "overpowered perks/weapons").

I thought the story line was brilliant, how it brought Price back in, and all the sudden plot twists.

Black Ops had an unbelievably stupid story, that was presented terribly, but it doesn't matter because the multiplayer was great (goes back to what made 4 good, and removes stopping power/martyrdom/juggernaut-type perks).

So, Black Ops has the best multiplayer, Call of Duty 4 was one of the best games of its time, and the rest of them (except 1 and 2) either suck, or simply aren't as good.

I didn't like black op's because it crashes too much.

[tikitai]

Not everyone runs around quickscoping. It's not illegal to camp with a sniper.

no im not talking about commando of commando: commando commando 2
i was talking about camp of camp: camp ops

[Dnitro]

I love the story line in mw2.

MW3 needs a zombies mode though.

[tikitai]

I love the story line in mw2.

MW3 needs a zombies mode though.

no no no
spec ops is awesome

[Ki Oreo]

I love the story line in mw2.

MW3 needs a zombies mode though.

I think it needs more alien mode and civilian slaughter rampage mode

[Night Fox]

Black Ops has the best multiplayer.

Complete bullstuff.

Call of Duty 4 was one of the best games of its time.

Agreed.

no no no
spec ops is awesome

I agree with this too.
I don't like the zombie mode, it's not fun to me.

I think it needs more alien mode and civilian slaughter rampage mode

Mixture of both.

[tikitai]

especially the wetwork mission because its basically a coop port of that campaign mission

[Ki Oreo]

http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/02/04/treyarch-discuss-possibility-of-a-futuristic-call-of-duty/
yay

[Dnitro]

http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/02/04/treyarch-discuss-possibility-of-a-futuristic-call-of-duty/
yay

holy stuff
it's gonna be epic

[Night Fox]

http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/02/04/treyarch-discuss-possibility-of-a-futuristic-call-of-duty/
yay

With Treyarch still making it, I'm not looking too much forward to it.
But that would be seriously loving awesome.