Poll

Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?

Yes
No
Yes, but not for several years

Author Topic: Opinions - Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?  (Read 118579 times)

Should i make an video games opinion thread? JUST for video games like this thread used to be.

no this thread is already pretty stupid as it is. we dont need two

I hope you realize that commiting Self Delete is a crime. Attempted Self Delete will get you put in jal and a psyco ward. Oviously you can't be sent to jail if you die, but you are arrested for self harm.
Yeah, and that's loving horrifying. If someone wants to die, no one should prevent them from making their own choice of whether or not to stop living. It's not anyone else's decision to make, and it sure as loving hell isn't the government's decision to make. I understand that we need to protect life, but you cannot keep someone alive that doesn't want to live, someone that cannot find joy in life, that's an atrocity in itself. You could say "but depressed people can get help blah blah". Yeah, they can, and they should, but that is a choice THEY have to make, not anyone else.

Win. Drugs should have been banned a long time ago. I have a history of people smoking on my dad's side of the family and dying because of it. Sad but that is what you get for smoking you loving idiot
So drugs should be banned because idiots in your family decided to smoke until they died? Maybe cars should be banned because people drunk drive hurrdurrr
It wouldn't be a problem if cigarettes didn't give off smoke, or if pregnant mothers didn't smoke cigarettes during their pregnancies or if smokers smoked them in their houses around their children. Sure, you can kill yourself, but you can't kill other people.
Again, this is a matter of poor decision making.

Let me make myself clear: I abhor the tobacco industry. It's pure loving evil. But I also sternly believe people have the right to do whatever they want to their bodies and their lives in the safety of their own home as long as it doesn't harm another person or infringes on their rights.



Anyone stupid enough to smoke cigarrettes shouldn't be put it jail, they should just keep doing ti until they die for being a pop fish morain.

If people want to kill themselves, let them do it. Just make it illegal for them to do it when others are around or when pregnant so know-one else has to die.
No, if you want to die, you jump off a cliff. If you want to kill yourself and others around you, you buy a gun. If you want to slowly kill yourself, others, and the environment, you smoke.

I wonder why smoking is legal, i men, you kill other people too.

Again, the government has no right to tell us what we can or cannot do with our own bodies.

um so what you saying is there's no possible way to stop production on something and illegalize it?... dumbass

no this thread is already pretty stupid as it is. we dont need two
I find this thread interesting. But one is enough.


Smoking should be restricted. No more then 15 each week per person.
That however, is impossible to monitor.

Sure, but not in public.

It's their own fault if they get an illness due to the tobacco.


Yeah, and that's loving horrifying. If someone wants to die, no one should prevent them from making their own choice of whether or not to stop living.
So I can strap bombs to myself and blow some people up, but not be charged with murder because I am dead?

So I can strap bombs to myself and blow some people up, but not be charged with murder because I am dead?
Technically, uh, yes, but how is that relevant? I'm saying that we as people have the right to end our OWN lives, not others lives unless under specific circumstance like war or being physically assaulted (someone putting your right to life at stake).
um so what you saying is there's no possible way to stop production on something and illegalize it?... dumbass
Right. The Volstead act/18th Amendment to the United States Constitution circa 1919. Do you know what that is? It was known as the start of the prohibition era, which only lasted four years and was largely an absolute failure.
Illegalizing something doesn't make it disappear you dipstuff. People started brewing alcohol in their own homes, in bathtubs and at hidden bars called "Speakeasies". Crime rates skyrocketed, the Sicilian Mafia took on immense power and thugs like Al Capone became untouchable. If people want something, they will get it, no matter what the government says. So, to answer your rhetorical question: No, there is absolutely no way to stop the creation and distribution of a substance.
Smoking should be restricted. No more then 15 each week per person.
That however, is impossible to monitor.
No one has the right to tell someone else how much of something they can have (at least until it becomes a problem, like becoming intoxicated at a bar, but even then you really can't do much anyway). To do so is an infringement of civil liberties.
I wonder why smoking is legal, i men, you kill other people too.
Smoking in public is being actively banned. By smoking in public you aren't killing anyone around you, a cigarette isn't a plastic explosive, though you are putting their lives at risk and generally being irritating, an infringement of the right to life and the pursuit of happiness.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2011, 01:02:40 AM by yuki »

Nope. Cigarettes and Cigars are more harmful than blunts, yet they're legal and weed isn't.


???


Nope. Cigarettes and Cigars are more harmful than blunts, yet they're legal and weed isn't.


???
This is so for a few reasons:
-Irrational, ineffective and stupid "war on drugs".
-People trying to attribute doing drugs to some sort of ethical dillema, like smoking weed makes you a worse person.
-Tobacco companies are long-lasting and absurdly rich companies with their claws dug so deep into american society the government couldn't stop them if they tried.
-Tobacco has a history of being "good" in the past. Only recently within the last 50 or so years have we discovered how horrible tobacco is for someone. People are stuck in the mindset that smoking is just a past-time and normal for people to do while weed has a reputation brought on by propaganda that shows it in a negative light. The fact that its illegal only aids this propaganda.

-Tobacco companies are long-lasting and absurdly rich companies with their claws dug so deep into american society the government couldn't stop them if they tried.
This has to be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Not to say its not true, but it just sounds ridiculous. That a set of companies can go toe-to-toe with it's own government and win just sounds totally absurd, even if the government has substantial evidence that what it's doing is completely unhealthy and bad for Americans as a whole, considering they're a huge waste of money.