Opinions - Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?

[D3ATH]

I would never kill anyone just for it having no consequences. That would be just wrong and evil. :(

[Ad Bot]

[IsaacKronenFaust]

Does this include not going to Hell, or just getting away prison and/or being shunned by society?

Oh Goddammit, I read the question wrong. I thought it meant if I could kill just anybody for some reason. Why would I wanna go and kill someone I don't even know just for the fun of it?

[Tylale]

Does this include not going to Hell?

Yeah but that doesn't exist so it doesn't matter.

[Littledude]

Yes, I want to know what it feels like to hold someone life in my hands.

[TristanLuigi]

I wish it could be for someone we DO know...

[Tylale]

I wish it could be for someone we DO know...

I think the next question is going to be the same thing with your worst enemy.

[Nymethus]

this is stupid

[Kalphiter]

The OP doesn't know what he's doing.

[Tylale]

The OP doesn't know what he's doing.

How?

[Ningyou]

Why would you do that?

[Malestrom]

No, I wouldn't.  If there is no 'reward' for killing this person, then why create a needless death?

[Skip]

The wording of the question confuses me
"don't know there would be no consequences"
what.

[Tylale]

The wording of the question confuses me
"don't know there would be no consequences"
what.

Would you kill someone you don't know? No consequences.

[Skip]

Would you kill someone you don't know? No consequences.

Proper wording would be "Would you kill someone if you knew there would be no consequences?"
You used a double negative. :v

And no, I wouldn't.
This also reminds me of a YouTube video I watched, where the guy could hit a button for one million dollars, but it caused the death of someone on earth.
I think it was like The Black Button or something. Had a somewhat obviose plottwist.

[Altered]

No, I wouldn't.  If there is no 'reward' for killing this person, then why create a needless death?