Poll

Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?

Yes
No
Yes, but not for several years

Author Topic: Opinions - Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?  (Read 120817 times)

If your mother was raped, would you be against her having an abortion? Period.
No, because she wouldn't be my mother then  :cookieMonster:

Rapist shall be purged with fire but I don't know what to do with the poor babies and victims. ;-;


Rapist shall be purged with fire but I don't know what to do with the poor babies and victims. ;-;
what if the rapists ask God for forgiveness with all the sincerity of their hearts and they are pious their entire life?

what if the rapists ask God for forgiveness with all the sincerity of their hearts and they are pious their entire life?

then they go to purgatory, then heaven.

then they go to purgatory, then heaven.
what about the mother that gets an abortion for the rape baby but they never repented

I would still wack em with a metal rod. But it is up to God to decide what to do with them,Iban. :)

Why such an arbitrary point? Why birth?
Birth is far from an arbitrary point you dumbass. Birth marks the point where the child is capable of existing separate from the mother.

what about the mother that gets an abortion for the rape baby but they never repented

purgatory then heaven

purgatory then heaven
but she wasn't religious why does she go to heaven?
did Riddler go to heaven?

purgatory then heaven


So for being raped, she gets the same fate as the rapist.

God is dumb.

Birth is far from an arbitrary point you dumbass. Birth marks the point where the child is capable of existing separate from the mother.
Actually, that's false. Many premature children survive.

Riddler went to bad man land.

Actually, that's false. Many premature children survive.
True, I wasn't really specific. But I have never heard of abortions happening past 7 or so months.

How the forget is that arbitrary? If I shoved you through another person's gaping axe wound I think you'd put that on your calendar or some stuff.

Because you're trying to use logic to win a philosophical argument when logically your argument is flawed.

I like how you compare an unwanted and underprivileged child to a masterpiece. Nice.
Except that all genocides in the past have been unfounded. The jews have been the target of this many times. national socialist Germany blamed them for destroying the economy and during the Black Plague they were accused of poisoning the wells with disease. The future "genocides" will be based on things that actually make sense. Instead of taking the hedge clippers to the head of the topiary, we'll trip the brown leaves.

Or like, find a way that doesn't involve the mass extermination of people. To the Germans, the holocaust made sense, even though it was nothing short of a despicable crime against humanity. How does that differ from say if the government decided that blind people had to go because they contributed nothing to society, and then killed all the blind people. Would that be justified in your eyes?