Author Topic: Duke Nukem is taking a beating.  (Read 8822 times)

I had a big feeling that this game would get bad reviews for some reason. Turns out I was right. :(

Not to mention they had less than 10 staff members and an incredibly low budget and a few big lawsuits AND people still expect the game to have Call of Duty graphics. This is loving absurd!
Are you talking about Gearbox?

Are you guys honestly bitching about only having 2 guns?

It makes perfect sense to be carrying your ak, bazooka, double barreled shotgun, magnum, uzi, sniper, and baseball bat all on your back, right?
This is Duke Nukem we're talking about, not call of duty. Are you just unaware of how the previous games played or are you just being a handicap again.

I think that Gearbox may of rushed the development. They should of spent at least an extra few months on it.

I had a big feeling that this game would get bad reviews for some reason. Turns out I was right. :(
Are you talking about Gearbox?

I am talking about 3D realms.

I think that Gearbox may of rushed the development. They should of spent at least an extra few months on it.
The problem is the players constantly rush the company.
The company can only work so fast, especially since
they had less than 10 staff members and an incredibly low budget and a few big lawsuits AND people still expect the game to have Call of Duty graphics.
They give the players an incomplete game to show them what happens when you rush companies.
The players, not wanting to take the blame, blame the company for not being better.

How good are you going to do if you were a small and near-bankrupt company trying to make a game look like Call of Duty in graphics?

How good are you going to do if you were a small and near-bankrupt company trying to make a game look like Call of Duty in graphics?

They aren't trying to compete with Call of Duty.

It makes me feel bad knowing that this is probably gonna be the last game Duke will go out on. :(

I'm still gonna get this later though. Looks fun.

They aren't trying to compete with Call of Duty.
I'm using it as a base line.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/117/1175639p1.html


Ouch 5.5 review.


I also don't get why people are bitching about graphics, it's loving better than Oblivion and Fallout 3's graphics,
« Last Edit: June 12, 2011, 10:01:57 AM by Lørd Tøny »

I really don't give a stuff about the graphics

wasn't this game made for the nostalgia?

I really don't give a stuff about the graphics

wasn't this game made for the nostalgia?

nostalgia means jack stuff, it's all about the graphics!

If the review picks on circle strafing then they clearly don't care for the nostalgia bit.

nostalgia means jack stuff, it's all about the graphics!

DUDE

THESE TEXTURES ARE A BIT STRETCHED

-3 POINTS

DUDE

THESE TEXTURES ARE A BIT STRETCHED

-3 POINTS

stuff man give me a break I had to go under 4 engine changes, don't make me go through 5!

Game informer gives than an 80/100 with a fair review.

IGN gives them 5.5 and eurogamer gives them 3/10. I smell biased reviews at play.

I always thought IGN was a bit baised