also AMD stuff I guessprocessorshttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103808http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103727small price difference, .2GHz differencewhichGPUshttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102874http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161365nothingI know nothingdoes it match everything else toogrr I don't understand all thiscan you just suggest parts instead
Define an absolute maximum.
Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.
Lol, no. AMD's top of the line processor can't touch any high end Intel processors.
Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.With your logic, Toyota must be better than Maserati.
</=$2,500 would be nice but no more than $4,000
hory shet. maybe ill put together my dream PC if i get bored. then you can buy it and i will be jealous.
I'm not going to buy it all at once
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.htmlIntel quad cores are better than AMD hexcores. What does that tell you? By this logic, 4 is better than 6 because apparently Intel made their quadcores better than AMD's hexcores.BTW, you kept saying that Intel had business trouble. Er go, I gave evidence that they're clearly not having trouble with business. Then you went on and jumped to performances, which Intel still leads.
Er... I hope its within a 3 month time period because by a year those parts will already be outdated with something better for the same amount of money.
so sheezy's trolling right?on that chart, the core i7 2600k scored almost 12,000. it's like $315. the highest scoring AMD processor, the Phenom II X6 1100T, scored around 6,000. It's like $220 or something.hurr durr.
There are at least 2-3 consumer level Intel CPUs above AMD's highest top of the line processor.You're stupid and you're making yourself look even worse.
1. Cherry picked answers.2. You're resorting to attacking my own intelligence. Running out of arguments?