Author Topic: Obligatory computer parts topic.  (Read 1476 times)

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/market_share.html

Intel is still leading.
also AMD stuff I guess

processors
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103808
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103727
small price difference, .2GHz difference
which

GPUs
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102874
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161365
nothing
I know nothingdoes it match everything else too
grr I don't understand all this
can you just suggest parts instead
Is money no object for you or something?  Define an absolute maximum.

Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.

With your logic, Toyota must be better than Maserati.

Define an absolute maximum.
</=$2,500 would be nice but no more than $4,000

Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.
Lol, no. AMD's top of the line processor can't touch any high end Intel processors.

Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.

With your logic, Toyota must be better than Maserati.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel quad cores are better than AMD hexcores.  What does that tell you?  By this logic, 4 is better than 6 because apparently Intel made their quadcores better than AMD's hexcores.

BTW, you kept saying that Intel had business trouble.  Er go, I gave evidence that they're clearly not having trouble with business.  Then you went on and jumped to performances, which Intel still leads.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2011, 11:49:34 PM by Nickelob Ultra »

</=$2,500 would be nice but no more than $4,000

hory shet. maybe ill put together my dream PC if i get bored. then you can buy it and i will be jealous.

hory shet. maybe ill put together my dream PC if i get bored. then you can buy it and i will be jealous.
I'm not going to buy it all at once

I'm not going to buy it all at once
Er... I hope its within a 3 month time period because by a year those parts will already be outdated with something better for the same amount of money.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Intel quad cores are better than AMD hexcores.  What does that tell you?  By this logic, 4 is better than 6 because apparently Intel made their quadcores better than AMD's hexcores.

BTW, you kept saying that Intel had business trouble.  Er go, I gave evidence that they're clearly not having trouble with business.  Then you went on and jumped to performances, which Intel still leads.
Business trouble as in business related.
Business =/= financial

Also, those are all super-high-end CPUs for the most part, costing over $1000, and they don't have the matching AMD super-high-end AMD CPUs. Look at the number of Intel CPUs tested vs AMD CPUs tested. Your answers are cherrypicked.


http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103913
AMD: 3.7 ghz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115079
Intel: 3.46 ghz

INTEL IS DEFINITELY BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!

Er... I hope its within a 3 month time period because by a year those parts will already be outdated with something better for the same amount of money.
money does not matter right now
parts do

so sheezy's trolling right?

on that chart, the core i7 2600k scored almost 12,000. it's like $315. the highest scoring AMD processor, the Phenom II X6 1100T, scored around 6,000. It's like $220 or something.

hurr durr.

so sheezy's trolling right?

on that chart, the core i7 2600k scored almost 12,000. it's like $315. the highest scoring AMD processor, the Phenom II X6 1100T, scored around 6,000. It's like $220 or something.

hurr durr.
Cherry picked answers. There are WAY more Intel CPUs tested on that than AMD CPUs.

There are at least 2-3 consumer level Intel CPUs above AMD's highest top of the line processor.

You're stupid and you're making yourself look even worse.

There are at least 2-3 consumer level Intel CPUs above AMD's highest top of the line processor.

You're stupid and you're making yourself look even worse.
1. Cherry picked answers.
2. You're resorting to attacking my own intelligence. Running out of arguments?

1. Cherry picked answers.
2. You're resorting to attacking my own intelligence. Running out of arguments?
Should I start repeating "cherry picked answers" too, then?