If you had brought your laptop, and watched the case every day like my family, you would know that the jurors were not stupid, the lawyers were. They found and proved no evidence of any kind at all. And as if she hadnt already served jail time, she had been in for 2 year (I think?) already, and she got 1 year (I think?) for lying to the court. Does this means she is guilty, it means she probobly feels guilty, and in retrospect is, but she was no found guilty because the lawyers produced no solid evidence. Also, if the Jurors thought she was not guilty at the beginning, they were dumbasses, but after a 30 day trial, im positive anyone would want to leave.
Bisjac was right as far as im concerned, and i will go out on a limb and say that he has more common sense than you at times.