Author Topic: EA is loving stupid.  (Read 6249 times)

[i mg]http://kokugamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Command-and-Conquer-4-Tiberium-Teilight.png[/img]

Explain this friendry.

Quote
Developer(s)    EA Los Angeles
Publisher(s)    Electronic Arts

Both so happen to be in the same company so negotiations are now void.

Tom

I think one of the reason Valve is the best game studio is because they publish stuff themselves.

IdSoftware is my childhood hero and I know they'd never voluntarily use GFWL.
You don't necessarily know that.

However publishers can easily forget up a developer company.  EA made Westwood rush out Tiberian Sun and Red Alert 2 when it was full of bugs, both.

Same to Lionhead in creating Black & White 1.

i meant it was useful because i could still communicate with my xbox LIVE friends from my windows if i dont have my console.
i take it the game was an utter disappointment?
No base building.
No tiberium gathering.
Nod and GDI work together for the most part of the campaign.
Scrin aren't playable anymore.

I haven't even played the game and I don't intend on doing so.

Both so happen to be in the same company so negotiations are now void.
Read above in this post.

I think one of the reason Valve is the best game studio is because they publish stuff themselves.
They are the best because of the large userbase, well received games and the highly successful Steam platform along with frequent sales.  They still want your money, they're just nice about it.

i meant it was useful because i could still communicate with my xbox LIVE friends from my windows if i dont have my console.

Really hard to do that when GFWL (and XBox Live) makes everyone sound exactly the same and that GFWL doesn't support party chat.

I think one of the reason Valve is the best game studio is because they publish stuff themselves.
so does EA.
and so far everybody loving hates them.

Really hard to do that when GFWL (and XBox Live) makes everyone sound exactly the same and that GFWL doesn't support party chat.
yeah, that was a drawback.

so does EA.
and so far everybody loving hates them.
EA doesn't make games at all.

They own developer companies but thats it.

Tom

so does EA.
and so far everybody loving hates them.
Thing is EA itself doesn't know anything about gaming. They are just a bunch of business people who have enough money to buy out other companies and then forget them up.

EA doesn't make games at all.

They own developer companies but thats it.
i meant as far as publishing.
they publish some of the stuff their dev companies make up.

Thing is EA itself doesn't know anything about gaming. They are just a bunch of business people who have enough money to buy out other companies and then forget them up.
Not really.  It's far-fetched statements like these that really just mess anyone else up on what is really happening.

They know what gaming is obviously or they wouldn't have been incredibly successful in publishing games.

Sony is a great publisher, they make sure their exclusives are taking care of and they wouldn't force a sequel to be made if the developers don't want a sequel (Halo 4).

Tom

They know what gaming is obviously or they wouldn't have been incredibly successful in publishing games.
They know what sells games. They don't know the real art of games.

Sony is a great publisher, they make sure their exclusives are taking care of and they wouldn't force a sequel to be made if the developers don't want a sequel (Halo 4).
That's nice for them.


I've honestly never purchased a Sony game and I feel like there won't be any reason to any time soon.

That's nice for them.


I've honestly never purchased a Sony game and I feel like there won't be any reason to any time soon.

Cool story bro.

k so we all agree.
EA sucks rooster.

k so we all agree.
EA sucks rooster.

Nope, I don't play PC games so this is no issue to me.