Author Topic: The Outrage that is Katy Perry  (Read 5199 times)

Atta' boi Sheath. You deliver dem cusses like there's no tomorrow.

Atta' boi Sheath. You deliver dem cusses like there's no tomorrow.




INSUBORDINATE MALFEASANT

side nudity is ok as long as;

1) you see no nipples
2) you see no pubic hair
3) you can only see 1 butt cheek at a time


video = pretty tame actually

side nudity is ok as long as;

1) you see no nipples
2) you see no pubic hair
3) you can only see 1 butt cheek at a time


video = pretty tame actually
nudity is ok in general Bisjac.

im referring to how its on youtube and people think its unacceptable

god, people and their feelings.

I liked that music video.


I loved the video, especially the part with her naked.

Musics not bad. Video's kinda hot.

Doubletoast:

I've been conversing with this lady that commented:
Quote from: MyMultimedia
I am OUTRAGED the U.S. Department of Justice doesn't legally define this as research! And I am still waiting for the FBI and the U.S. Secret Service to send a letter to Katy Perry informing her of their DISPLEASURE of what this INSUBORDINATE MALFEASANT is giving to teens! The only reason teens all across the USA like this GARBAGE is because Katy Perry's videos on YouTube are basically the only major ones that aren't even AGE RESTRICTED with a pop singer that keeps her breasts out and visible!
Quote from: MrLordOasis
@MyMultimedia I fail to see the researchographic nature of this video. Face it, times are changing, the things shown on TV today would have been considered blasphemy in the 60s.
Quote from: MyMultimedia
@MrLordOasis I agree with you on the second sentence, but you didn't recognize Katy Perry having her breasts out and visible as research? Or how about a series of instances of Katy Perry being completely nude with only a small strip of cloud (or cotton candy, whatever it is) blocking the most offensive areas of her body? Even though the most offensive areas are blocked, it still can be construed as research, since even someone with a second grade education knows what's behind the blockage!
Quote from: MrLordOasis
@MyMultimedia When a woman or a man is fully clothed, I assure you anyone with a second grade education knows what's behind the blockage.
Quote from: MyMultimedia
@MrLordOasis Katy Perry was NOT fully clothed. The visibility of the remainder of her body compells viewers to imagine what Katy Perry will be like had that small strip of cotton candy wasn't in the way! If I was in DC on the National Mall, even though people still can imagine what's behind the clothing, that's not indecency. On the other hand if a girl who's nude was in front of the Lincoln Memorial with only a small strip of cotton candy blocking the obscene part, who wouldn't call the police?
Quote from: MrLordOasis
@MyMultimedia Nor did I say she was. But in reality, the National Mall is a weak point to make. The beach for instance, a place where women and men can be barely clothed, and not arrested. It's socially acceptable, mostly morally accepted nowadays, and is the equivalent of your "small strip of cotton candy". I would like you to think about the ultimate issue you are portraying in your comments, because in reality, we all know what's where.
I'll edit as more come in.

Katy Perry is a whore who can't sing live but when it's studio version it's so good!