Your Stance on Laws (Or punishment); Today's Topic: Abortions

[chaseyqurt]

I don't see why you would want to shoot someone breaking into your house in the first place. Thieves are people, too. Not all of them are armed and ready to kill. :c

Plus, so much clean up afterwards. Blood and broken glass, oi, it's hardly worth the trouble.

...

That is honestly one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, if someone is breaking into your house they are not breaking in with good intent and it's safe to assume that they are willing to harm you and your family, I'd sleep soundly after shooting someone breaking into my house.

[Ad Bot]

[stuntman021]

Dude, if you're inside a house you aren't going to have trouble hitting someone else a couple meters infront of you.

not when your arm is disabled. and in the time it would take to switch your gun to the other hand, they'd have enough time to squeeze off another round

...

That is honestly one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, if someone is breaking into your house they are not breaking in with good intent and it's safe to assume that they are willing to harm you and your family, I'd sleep soundly after shooting someone breaking into my house.

that's dumb too. use the gun as a way to keep them from bolting until the police arrive. only shoot if they pull out a weapon

[chaseyqurt]

Your arm isn't going to immediately  be disabled, you will still probably be able to shoot after getting hit in the arm, of course you won't be deadeye accurate and won't be able to for more than a couple shots but, with the adrenaline pumping through your body the feeling won't be instant.

use the gun as a way to keep them from bolting until the police arrive. only shoot if they pull out a weapon

I'm talking about if someone has a weapon and is inside of your house, there's no reason to kill someone if they're unarmed.

[zaksar]

anybody can turn criminal at any time.

and criminals don't give a stuff if an automatic rifle is illegal or not they will still get one no mater what, they will still use them.

[stuntman021]

Your arm isn't going to immediately  be disabled, you will still probably be able to shoot after getting hit in the arm, of course you won't be deadeye accurate and won't be able to for more than a couple shots but, with the adrenaline pumping through your body the feeling won't be instant.
I'm talking about if someone has a weapon and is inside of your house, there's no reason to kill someone if they're unarmed.

you'd be a hell of a lot less likely to hit center mass and might just graze them or something.
agreed

[Dodger]

anybody can turn criminal at any time.

They are still less likely to mess with someone if they are armed too.

[Lørd Tøny]

I say we go back to the wild west age, except with more deadly guns.

[zaksar]

I say we go back to the wild west age, except with more deadly guns.

yes

[Custard]

Well, with restrictions to guns and weaponry obviously means restriction to criminal activity. The weaponry outlet should only be used for hunting.

Having a weapon of self defense is purposeless if nobody else has a gun.

[Lørd Tøny]

Well, with restrictions to guns and weaponry obviously means restriction to criminal activity. The weaponry outlet should only be used for hunting.

Having a weapon of self defense is purposeless if nobody else has a gun.

Well I'm going to go out hunting for humans I mean animals.

[Custard]

Well I'm going to go out hunting for humans I mean animals.

Hunting guns aren't fully loaded guns capable of Flash Mob. You're going to have a hell of a time hunting humans with that kind of gun.

[Nymethus]

If a criminal breaks into your house, you have better luck of killing them if you have an automatic weapon.

There's this thing called calling the police, and then there's your thing which is called trying to get yourself killed.

it's more dangerous to have a gun than not to have one if you get robbed or something

-because he's gonna loving shoot you if you have a gun

Hunting guns aren't fully loaded guns capable of Flash Mob. You're going to have a hell of a time hunting humans with that kind of gun.

murder is bad enough

[Jacob/Lee]

You're a loving moron. If a criminal breaks into your house, you have better luck of killing them if you have an automatic weapon. The recoil would cause you to drop it, but if you held that trigger for longer than 2 seconds, there is a good chance you landed a shot on them.

Stuntman is a handicap, but he actually has a point. Holding down the trigger won't get you anywhere after the first couple shots unless you have military training with automatic weapons which teaches you NOT to constantly fire like that.

[Lørd Tøny]

Hunting guns aren't fully loaded guns capable of Flash Mob. You're going to have a hell of a time hunting humans with that kind of gun.

Ah but you see it's all in the fun of the hunt! No one has guns but the hunters themselves so you have all the time in the world to kill as many people as you can before the hunt is over.

[zaksar]

Well, with restrictions to guns and weaponry obviously means restriction to criminal activity. The weaponry outlet should only be used for hunting.

Having a weapon of self defense is purposeless if nobody else has a gun.

who the hell told you that making something illegal makes it go away? if you think banning guns would stop anyone but law abiding civilians from buying guns off the black market?