Poll

Do you agree with gay marriage

Yes
117 (60%)
No
48 (24.6%)
I'm gay.
30 (15.4%)

Total Members Voted: 195

Author Topic: Your opinion on gay people  (Read 12754 times)

At the time of our founding fathers? Do you have a record of any gay people? Was the terminology "gay" even invented yet?

Who's in Gay Studies? Tell us these facts.
Since EVER. Why else would the bible mention it if the problem wasn't prevalent? There's always been homoloveuals, just like there's always been child enthusiasts.

Since EVER. Why else would the bible mention it if the problem wasn't prevalent? There's always been homoloveuals, just like there's always been child enthusiasts.
I thought this was an obvious, lol.

I have a problem with sassy gay people. Other than that it's cool if they don't try anything.

Since EVER. Why else would the bible mention it if the problem wasn't prevalent? There's always been homoloveuals, just like there's always been child enthusiasts.

The Bible does not mention gays, it merely states that a man should love a woman and vice versa.

I would like to know where everyone is getting their "facts" from. People need to stop relying on crap that they hear or crap the media throws at them, and research stuff for themselves.

Back then they still used it to describe happy or joyful. I think homoloveuals at that time were reffered to as "queers," which is offensive these days.

Well, if I called you a queer gay friend back then, you would think that I had just accused you of being a strange happy cigarette :)
« Last Edit: October 05, 2011, 07:21:00 PM by Wesley Williams »

Swholli, if you ever want to make a prefect persuasive argument, do not involve personal beliefs but facts alone. Other than your constant  harsh accusations you had a fair argument.

Well, you can't fact check an opinion. My personal belief means nothing, these are the fact of our government, the argument being if the state has any rights to tell a person whether or not they can marry.

So you're telling everyone to accept gays because we're a free country and then turning around and denouncing Christians? That's just expressing a slightly biased point of view. When you're trying to persuade others it's best to not call them "arrogant twats", or say the Bible is outdated - which loses your argument's credibility.

Firstly, I never once mentioned Christians. I used the Bible as an example of religious connotation because our country is 80% Christian, and it's usually them who bring about all of this hatred. I don't have anything against their religious views, it's just that they have no right in this country to impose those views onto me.

Getting away with raping our founding father's views? Believe it or not, every last one of our founding fathers were Christian

Nope. Stop it. I am a history major, I am studying this and plan to make it my profession. And as it turns out, I know for a fact that they were not all Christians.

No granted, there were some who were. Take Benjamin Rush, for instance, one of the men who signed our Declaration. He was a strong believer in Christ and was also an advocate for keeping the church and state together rather than separate.

Needless to say, when the time came to ratify our new constitution years later, he was not present at that convention.

You see, many right wing Christians like to throw around the idea that our founders were Christians. That just simply is not the case. Firstly, they and many other men of what is known as the Enlightenment were Deists. This is a term that means they more than likely believed in a higher power, they simply did not believe in organized religion.

Thomas Jefferson, a man held in high regards in American history, was a strong advocate for separation of Church and state. He not only owned a bible, he also read and owned a Tanakh and a Koran. He went so far into his ideology of faith being determined by choice that he denounced the Christian Bible and went and wrote his own. Jefferson would fit in very well with modern day Agnostics, and some historians are even inclined to go as far and say Jefferson was an atheist.

The Bible or any other religious document has no place in government, and this applies directly to gay marriage as religion is the only thing dictating that it's wrong. The founders would be appalled and distraught to think that they broke away from the King to create a country with such strong principals of personal freedom (slavery withstanding as they honestly believed it would eventually go away ((something I've said before, actually))) to have it being tainted with right wing evangelists trying to muck up the system with their personal beliefs. Beliefs that I and many others do not agree with, which in its very nature is a constitutional crime against my first amendment rights.

- and at the time there was probably one gay person in the world. It seems to me that being gay is a fad that has started in the past couple decades -

You are clearly uneducated.

Hello.

The Greeks.

I mean. I really don't even have to say any more than that.

In fact, I can go as far as to say that disliking homoloveuals is a far newer fad started with Christianity, which was written at a time to break away with the ideals of the Roman empire (which took a lot of things from the Greeks, including public, all men bath houses).

the reason we're getting a steady rise in the number of gays is because of more a desire for attention than really having "love" for a person of the same love. But hey, that's just me, and I'm not gay so I couldn't truly tell you.

No, the reason they are getting a steady rise is because finally people are realizing that this is just another human rights issue. We have people in power opposing their own ideology on another human being because it's what they deem morally wrong. And you wonder why I call them arrogant twats.

Christianity, for better or for worse, is no longer as great a power in the United States as it was fifty years ago. People are starting to believe in reason and critical thinking again. It's really like another Enlightenment period that our founders were in all those years ago. People are realizing the injustice it is to ban a person his or her right to marry another person whom he or she loves. Whom he or she wishes to spend the rest of their lives with, and subsequently, whom he or she would never be allowed to see in a hospital bed if the other is injured, or accept their rightful inheritance if the partner should pass on.

Our country was founded on the principals of freedoms, one of which being religion. To do this to the homoloveual community is denying them their basic, inalienable rights.

Dirty monday stuff
1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the loveually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homoloveual offender.

You're definitely a loving troll.

i dont mind them

let them do what they want with their lives

1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the loveually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homoloveual offender.

I have been convicted of hypocrisy lol. That's what I get for only finishing one year of my two year Bible reading course.

Also thanks for calling me a troll. I just love having pleasant debates on the Blockland Forums.

Our country was founded on the principals of freedoms, one of which being religion. To do this to the homoloveual community is denying them their basic, inalienable rights.

Oh cool... I've never studied the Greeks or any other of that stuff. I'm in AP Euro right now and all we talk about is Christianity in Europe. Anyways, I don't get why everyone connects freedom with marriage. People of the same love don't couple by nature - and can't produce children. People are trying to protect traditional marriage. I really don't care though.

PLONG PLAY PLAY PLONG PLAY PLAY

I have been convicted of hypocrisy lol. That's what I get for only finishing one year of my two year Bible reading course.

Also thanks for calling me a troll. I just love having pleasant debates on the Blockland Forums.

Oh cool... I've never studied the Greeks or any other of that stuff. I'm in AP Euro right now and all we talk about is Christianity in Europe. Anyways, I don't get why everyone connects freedom with marriage. People of the same love don't couple by nature - and can't produce children. People are trying to protect traditional marriage. I really don't care though.
If you even go far enough as to announce your ignorance then why do you try to bring up solid points?

Also, it's plainly obvious that you don't take any of this seriously, and you're just throwing bullstuff where you please. If you want to do that, don't do it here please.

I voted yes before I seen the "I'm Gay" option >:C

Dont blame Gay people. Blame their parents. They probably did something wrong while raising them that made them gay.
look at this post
look at how wrong it is

look at this post
look at how wrong it is
Menen's probably joking.

Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

People of the same love don't couple by nature - and can't produce children.

It's not really about the ability to produce.

See, it's like if I told you couldn't marry the girl you wanted because you were both straight, and being straight is immoral.

Now, that's obviously my opinion, as you view it as perfectly natural, and that you love and respect the person you're with and want to make a legal, binding contract that ties the two of you together. It's both a ceremony of symbolic nature as well as a right in this country to legally become this person's "relative," basically meaning you're able to visit them in hospitals and handle their affairs when they are unable.

Denying people that is, to me and others, more morally wrong than them marrying in the first place. So what if they're the same love? Oh, what, the Bible says so? Again, religious freedoms says very specifically that I don't have to listen to you or your Bible.

And frankly, just let them adopt then. If we're having such a problem with the moral wrongness of abortions (oop, another topic coming, I can smell it) then why don't we make gay marriage legal and have every would-be abortion case (that isn't an abortion due to complications of birth that could very well result in the death of the mother) simply given to a gay couple. That'll solve all sorts of problems!

People are trying to protect traditional marriage. I really don't care though.

To me that's just their cop out. What is tradition any more? I mean, the divorce rate is 50% in this country. That means every one in two marriages are destined to end. That means things like single mothers and fathers, step parents, multiple houses, etc. Marriage is no longer and never will again be what it once was. The nuclear family is a thing of the past, and as it turns out we didn't need it in the first place. I know a lot of kids who grew up in single parent households, and they turned out just fine.

To me that's just their cop out. What is tradition any more? I mean, the divorce rate is 50% in this country. That means every one in two marriages are destined to end. That means things like single mothers and fathers, step parents, multiple houses, etc. Marriage is no longer and never will again be what it once was. The nuclear family is a thing of the past, and as it turns out we didn't need it in the first place. I know a lot of kids who grew up in single parent households, and they turned out just fine.

Divorces are ridiculous anymore, but that's in part a result of young marriages and unresolved issues upon marriage. People just don't take it to be as serious a matter as it used to be. And kids that grow up in households of divorced parents can turn out fine, but must undergo very emotional childhoods. I would hate for my parents to be divorced. I have a friend who's in that situation, and he hates his life. It's really sad.