Author Topic: Theory of relativity proven wrong  (Read 2568 times)

holy forget, this makes einstein wrong in which he said nothing can go faster than the speed of light. :c

Einstein didn't have powerful particle accelerators like we do now.
yeah I mean that was back in WWII, but it's not as dramatically long ago as Newton

holy forget, this makes einstein wrong in which he said nothing can go faster than the speed of light. :c

If it has mass that is.

Scientists really need to keep up with these things.

Basically this means that 100 years of modern science is wrong. :/
Science is meant to have mistakes. It is meant to have flaws. It is, at its core, the study of mistakes people made and what was learned from them. You can't search for something you do not know is there, you can honestly only stumble across it while searching for something else or while looking back at old findings. It is our building on the shoulders of each other, our learning from these mistakes we make, and the discovers of the faults in our works that we learn truth. And it is in that truth we may move forward.

yeah I mean that was back in WWII, but it's not as dramatically long ago as Newton

That doesn't mean he knew everything we know now, he still has room for error, not as much as Newton though.

If it has mass that is.

Doesn't everything have mass, even on a negligible level?

math is the only thing we can depend on
every other subject it unstable, and science is even more so than the rest of them
math, math never changes
That doesn't mean he knew everything we know now, he still has room for error, not as much as Newton though.
I wasn't trying to disagree, I was just saying how it's given that Newton would mess up somewhere

math is the only thing we can depend on
every other subject it unstable, and science is even more so than the rest of them
math, math never changesI wasn't trying to disagree, I was just saying how it's given that Newton would

Newton also made calculus if I remember

Math for the win

Doesn't everything have mass, even on a negligible level?

There is no real evidence of true mass in light. Maybe "rest mass" but that's it.

pssh math, history is where its at.

There is no real evidence of true mass in light. Maybe "rest mass" but that's it.

Still mass bro.

energy doesn't have mass
energy is weird...

pssh math, history is where its at.

But with history I can't calculate how far away I can hit a man 6 feet 3 inches tall in the head with a bullet shot at a 65 degree angle 4.5 feet from the ground with a starting velocity of 1200 m/s now, can I?