Poll

Bad?

Bad.
11 (11.8%)
Very bad.
73 (78.5%)
Nope, good.
0 (0%)
Nope, very good.
9 (9.7%)

Total Members Voted: 93

Author Topic: "PROTECT-IP / E-PARASITE Act" - Congress is at it again  (Read 4238 times)

"very bad" is an understatement

this is absolute loving horsestuff
« Last Edit: October 28, 2011, 06:54:52 AM by Kingdaro »

"very bad" is an understatement

this is absolute loving bullstuff
Id prefer horsestuff, its more derogatory than bullstuff. But ok

Id prefer horsestuff, its more derogatory than bullstuff. But ok
works.

Wait, what will anyone gain from this?

This has happened so much before but never got passed, if at any point it does get agreed upon, we simply assassinate the people that wanted it one by one until it is revoked.
:D

This has happened so much before but never got passed, if at any point it does get agreed upon, we simply assassinate the people that wanted it one by one until it is revoked.
:D
That is actually not a bad idea.

This has happened so much before but never got passed, if at any point it does get agreed upon, we simply assassinate the people that wanted it one by one until it is revoked.
:D
Assassination of the stupid? Works for me!

Remember, It still has to get past the House of Representatives. (And Obama and the Supreme Court)

Remember, It still has to get past the House of Representatives. (And Obama and the Supreme Court)
I have my fingers crossed for a Veto.

Excuse me, I have to go call Bill Nelson.

AGAIN.

Obama would never pass- oh god.
What if the morons who never use the internet get it passed without Obama! (I forgot what it's called)

Obama would never pass- oh god.
What if the morons who never use the internet get it passed without Obama! (I forgot what it's called)
Hax.

Ugh.


Where's John Wilkes Booth when you need him?

Pretty much I guess.
You don't know what the bill does, do you?  It's meant to black list sites that provide copywrited content.  research sites don't do that.  The bad part of the bill is that it would shut down innocent sites that may be connected to one that may not be innocent, or content that falls under fair use could be blocked.

You don't know what the bill does, do you?  It's meant to black list sites that provide copywrited content.  research sites don't do that.  The bad part of the bill is that it would shut down innocent sites that may be connected to one that may not be innocent, or content that falls under fair use could be blocked.
Consider me corrected then.