Stuntman021- Just wait a moment!

[Firecycle]

I had made an anti-abortion comment on a thread, and Stuntman021 responds with this. I'm AFK at the time, but he assumes that I'm just ignoring him and sends me a personal message with the question labeled "read and respond to this stuff" Then when I get back I started This thread before checking in on the thread where I made the comment. Immediately he purposefully de-rails my thread.

The point he made was good, and I am doing a bit of research. I will post a response by this time tomorrow.



Please don't make this a flame war about abortion.

[Ad Bot]

[stuntman021]

it seemed a lot like you were dodging the question, and considering a lot of anti-abortion people i pose that to dodge it you can kinda understand why i did that stuff

[Night Fox]

you were a bit quick to jump to conclusions though

[Jubel]

People aren't on the forums every second of the day you dumb stuff.

[stuntman021]

People aren't on the forums every second of the day you dumb stuff.

his online thingy said he was on

[asablief]

you do know that dramaing stuntman is like waves crashing against rocks in huge sprays of handicapation?

I.E. he has the "oh cool everyone wants my head on a pike" mentality.

[Pepsidude]

his online thingy said he was on

He probably had it tabbed/behind a game or something

[Bushido]

what.

why did you make a post in drama if you DIDN'T want to start something

better question: why did you draw more attention to your point then necessary if you didn't want to start something

[Jubel]

his online thingy said he was on

So, doesn't mean he'll respond soon.
I usually leave my computer on with Chrome open, so I'm "online" all the time, but I'm not actually there.

[DrenDran]

The only thing I can disagree with here was bringing it into another thread, other than that his responce was resonable, and if he really felt you should read it, so be it, a single message doesn't hurt.

[Firecycle]

The only thing I can disagree with here was bringing it into another thread, other than that his responce was resonable, and if he really felt you should read it, so be it, a single message doesn't hurt.

I guess you're right. It just really ticked me off that he took it into another thread.

[Planr]

IMO pro-choice supporters obviously think that human life has no value

A living thing technically has to be able to reproduce, and since a fetus cannot do that (among other things) it is for some reason classified as not a living thing, despite the fact that it is alive and has a beating heart and everything.

And despite that fact, children are still considered a living thing even though they can't reproduce either.

What's up with that?

[Daemon18553]

Children have gonads. Girls already have egg cells.

[TeslaCoil]

Human Caviar anyone?

[Bisjac]

IMO pro-choice supporters obviously think that human life has no value

agreed. forget living things that arent me.