Author Topic: Stocking - No explanation needed.  (Read 51728 times)

I can just imagine it. Guy on guy love, disgusting. What do you even do... Sodomy? It sounds more painful than pleasurable.

Homoloveual men often just do oral when they have love. brown town is a sometimes thing.

I volunteer to do both with Stocking, in the name of science.





I don't like Stocking but notice number two is ridiculous. There was a gigantic argument over if she was a girl no thanks to Lord Tony being a handicap.

I don't like Stocking but notice number two is ridiculous. There was a gigantic argument over if she was a girl no thanks to Lord Tony being a handicap.

Not to mention the Photobucket account isn't mine, and Ninja Guy's "evidence" is just blatant stereotyping.

whats so bad about having love, again?

its just as wanted by females as men, i dont see why UR A FUKEN HORE!!!! just because a female has love.

whats so bad about having love, again?

its just as wanted by females as men, i dont see why UR A FUKEN HORE!!!! just because a female has love.

YEAH YOU TELL 'EM PHILBEAN

its just as wanted by females as men,
Not technically, men have the higher love drive/libido.

whats so bad about having love, again?

its just as wanted by females as men, i dont see why UR A FUKEN HORE!!!! just because a female has love.
Because if a guy has love when he's young, he scores.
If a girl has love when she's young, she's a whore.

At least according to the media or what other people say.

Because if a guy has love when he's young, he scores.
If a girl has love when she's young, she's a whore.

At least according to the media or what other people say.
My theory of why society looks at it like that is this:
It's an evolutionary psychology thing. Think about it like the following (not using humans as the example species here, rather just a general one)

The male of the species has an inherent instinct to spread his genes as much as possible, which is why that's a "score" or good thing if he does
The female of the species should and needs to carefully select a mate, risking mixing with the wrong genes if she doesn't, so if she sleeps with lots of males, it's a bad thing; whore.

My theory of why society looks at it like that is this:
It's an evolutionary psychology thing. Think about it like the following (not using humans as the example species here, rather just a general one)

The male of the species has an inherent instinct to spread his genes as much as possible, which is why that's a "score" or good thing if he does
The female of the species should and needs to carefully select a mate, risking mixing with the wrong genes if she doesn't, so if she sleeps with lots of males, it's a bad thing; whore.
Evolutionary psychology is a crock of stuff and I'd say your example for females could be applied to males too

Because if a guy has love when he's young, he scores.
If a girl has love when she's young, she's a whore.

At least according to the media or what other people say.

If a 16 year old is having love with a bunch of random males ages from 20-30+ then she is a whore.

just because you losers haven't had any love (i'm looking at you, tony) doesn't mean she hasn't, come on now.

I never said Stocking hasn't had love. I even went as far as saying Stocking had love with a bunch of 20 year olds.

Why are you talking directly towards me then?

I think they said she's lying about only having done it with two people.

The way I figure it is that she has love on average three times per week. If we are generous and assume about 70% are repeat customers then that means she has at least 47 loveual partners per year.
Also shes's 17 which means around 799 in total. That's a lot!

Also shes's 17 which means around 799 in total. That's a lot!
Well I assume she's only been loveually active since around age 12, so closer to 250. That's still a lot though; more than many research stars even!