i'm pretty sure they intended people to do some killing in postal 2unless you're a pacifist like the question you ignoredand i dont really give a forget about humor as long as the game is fun
why is linearity a massive game-crippling factor in everythingalmost every bandit hideout in skyrim is linear and it's the most fun game I've ever played.
because linearity is really hard to get rightpostal 3 doesn't get it right
they intended, but it was completely 100% possible to beat postal 2 monday-friday without killing a single personalso no
it was POSSIBLE, but not INTENDED.that's like saying that a game is good because you can quickscope in it
GOD DAMMIT STUNTMANSTOP TELLING ME WHAT TO THINKI'M GETTING POSTAL 3 FOR THE NOVELTY OF ITYOU'RE NOT GOING TO STOP ME
So can you imagine how hard it must be to get non-linearity right? You act like you know everything about the gaming industry.
Don't listen to Stuntman, he's too cool for the internet anywayhis bitching about games is based on opinions, and opinions only.
actually, it's a fact that postal 3 is linear. it's a fact that postal 2 is possible to complete without firing a shot, throwing a grenade, or kicking anyone. it's a fact that postal 3 is third person. it's a fact that you are forced to kill in postal 3.
but i'm also stating facts
It's also a fact that your fact-"stating" clearly wasn't neededand?forcing "facts" into everyone's eyes =/= stating them
it was needed for me to make points on why postal 3 sucks every richard in the world
postal 3 takes all of the worst parts from postal 2 and uses them while throwing out all the best parts of postal 2don't listen to shell this game is a complete and utter linear piece of bargain bin level stuff
Can you still kick n piss?