Author Topic: Smoking weed is better than not smoking  (Read 3843 times)


it didn't say that. it said it's not as harmful to your lungs.

Weed smokers and non-weed smokers have practically the same lungs? So nothing new was found out? Thanks article!




i live in the bay area, and everyone smokes a joint whenever they can. it's crazy.


it didn't say that. it said it's not as harmful to your lungs.


Quote from: from article
Putting together 20 years of data—and using the magic of statistics to separate the effects of pot from those of tobacco, since people often smoke both—the researchers found that pot smokers seemed to have better lung function than people who didn’t smoke at all.

Does it occur to anyone that the so called researchers could be bullstuffing just to reach out to the sheep to change public opinion on weed? Sure its not as bad as tabacco cigerretes filled with tar and other harmful chems, but last time I checked smoke inhalation of any kind hurts the lungs.

Did they compare exercise habits of both sets of participants? What about average ages?

Does it occur to anyone that the so called researchers could be bullstuffing just to reach out to the sheep to change public opinion on weed? Sure its not as bad as tabacco cigerretes filled with tar and other harmful chems, but last time I checked smoke inhalation of any kind hurts the lungs.
agreed

this definitely wouldn't be the first time a major scientific study was wrong.

Also, they did this over 20 years apparently. Do they also realize that more modern weed tends to have more things laced to it, and is more concentrated?