redundancy doesn't excuse this kind of sadistic ideology.
What do you mean? Sadistic implies he wants innocent children to be harmed and enjoys the idea. I think the approach he is taking is more so indifference. I guess it goes with the old maxim that if the world won't stop for us, why should we stop for it. And though I agree that ignoring happenings in the world will rarely lead to good, that it is important to learn from the world around you, and that empathy must be extended to all members of mankind, at the same time we have to understand that not everything can be solved by a matter of desire. And while we shouldn't always wait for others to solve issues, we have to decide what issues we approach.
I understand why you feel strongly about this Seventh, I do. And for the most part, I agree with you. But at the same time, you have to understand that others feel differently and that is the nature of the world. Sometimes it may be sadistic or malicious, but in this case it really isn't. Taboo's view, in moderation (Which he seems to have just fine), is completely valid and can even be argued in the extreme.
'Not sure if you're being sarcastic or just you.... :o
On reflection, maybe you thought I was being passive aggressive. I knew a should have added a ":o" somewhere in there. :U
Then again, maybe you didn't, and I misread your comments. So torn...